Key result
Among ICD recipients, 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction during induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was present in 4.4% of patients with inducible SMVT (95% CI 1.2-7.6%).
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of 1:1 retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction during inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in ICD recipients?
Observational (n=305)
What is the prevalence of 1:1 retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction during inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in ICD recipients?
A small but nonnegligible proportion (2.3%) of ICD recipients demonstrate 1:1 VA conduction during inducible SMVT, highlighting a challenge for tachyarrhythmia-discrimination algorithms in dual chamber ICDs.
Despite the advent of dual chamber ICDs, differentiation of VT (SMVT) with 1:1 VA conduction will remain a challenge. In this study, VA conduction capability and prevalence of inducible sustained monomorphic (SM) VT with 1:1 VA conduction was assessed in 305 ICD recipients. SMVT with a mean cycle length (CL) of 304 +/- 61 ms was induced in 161 (53%) patients. Twenty-six percent of the patients maintained 1:1 VA conduction to CL < or = 400 ms during incremental ventricular pacing, regardless of presenting tachyarrhythmia or presence of inducible SMVT. Among ten patients who had inducible SMVT with possible 1:1 VA conduction (based on SMVT CL comparable to the shortest CL associated with 1:1 retrograde conduction during ventricular pacing), all seven with available intracardiac tracings had documented 1:1 VA conduction during the induced SMVT--representing 4.4% of the patients with inducible SMVT (95% CI 1.2%-7.6%), and 2.3% of the entire ICD cohort (95% CI 0.6%-4.0%). We conclude that about one-fifth of ICD recipients possess 1:1 VA conduction to CL < or = 400 ms and that inducible SMVT with 1:1 VA conduction can be demonstrated in a small but nonnegligible proportion of ICD recipients. These data are relevant to the design of tachyarrhythmia-discrimination algorithms for dual chamber ICDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Militianu et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients (n=305). Ventriculoatrial conduction assessment was evaluated on Prevalence of 1:1 VA conduction during induced SMVT among patients with inducible SMVT (95% CI 1.2-7.6). Among ICD recipients, 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction during induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was present in 4.4% of patients with inducible SMVT (95% CI 1.2-7.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: