Key result
Metabolic syndrome is linked to ~20% lower left ventricular isovolumic myocardial acceleration.
Why the study?
Does metabolic syndrome reduce subclinical right and left ventricular systolic function (measured by IVA) in patients with preserved ejection fraction?
Case-Control (n=133)
Single observer blinded to clinical details
No
Does metabolic syndrome reduce subclinical right and left ventricular systolic function (measured by IVA) in patients with preserved ejection fraction?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.2% vs 4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Patients with metabolic syndrome have subclinical left and right ventricular dysfunction that can be detected early using load-independent tissue Doppler imaging parameters such as isovolumic myocardial acceleration.
May aid early detection of subclinical biventricular dysfunction in metabolic syndrome; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess subclinical left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction novel load-independent isovolumic myocardial acceleration (IVA) derived from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in patient with metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: This study had an observational case-control design. The study included 133 subjects which were divided into two groups: 75 patients with MetS and 58 controls without MetS. MetS was defined by the presence of ≥3 criteria according to ATP-NCEP III guidelines. All the subjects underwent laboratory blood tests and complete conventional echocardiography and TDI. Student's t, Mann-Whitney U, Pearson's, and multiple regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant difference between two groups in terms of traditional echocardiographic parameters. The diastolic and global functions of both ventricles were significantly impaired in MetS group. The TDI-derived IVA of the LV and the RV was significantly lower in patients with MetS (3.2±0.9 vs. 4.0±1.4, p<0.001 and 2.6±0.7 vs. 3.1±0.9, p=0.001, respectively). Whereas, TDI derived systolic velocity (Sa), and peak myocardial velocity during isovolumic contraction (IVV) of both ventricles were similar between the two groups. In the multiple regression analysis, waist circumference and diastolic blood pressure were found to be an independent determinant of IVA of LV (b=-.223, 95% CI=-.034 -.002, p=0.004) and RV (b=-.527, 95% CI=-.085 -.020, p=0.002) respectively. CONCLUSION: MetS affects global, diastolic, and systolic functions of two ventricles. This disruption lead to decreased function of heart was related with raised risk factors of MetS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ertürk et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in Metabolic syndrome (n=133). Metabolic syndrome vs. Controls without metabolic syndrome was evaluated on Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction assessed by isovolumic myocardial acceleration (IVA) derived from tissue Doppler imaging (p=<0.001). Metabolic syndrome exposure significantly reduced subclinical left ventricular (3.2 vs. 4.0 m/sec2) and right ventricular (2.6 vs. 3.1 m/sec2) isovolumic myocardial acceleration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: