Why the study?
Does repeated thrombolysis with rt-PA improve ST recovery in AMI patients with failed initial reperfusion after streptokinase therapy?
Does repeated thrombolysis with rt-PA improve ST recovery in AMI patients with failed initial reperfusion after streptokinase therapy?
In a very small cohort of AMI patients with failed initial reperfusion, repeated thrombolysis with rt-PA did not improve ST recovery compared to placebo.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repeat rt-PA fails to improve ST recovery after failed SK; challenges repeat thrombolysis and leaves optimal rescue strategy open.
Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase (SK) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) does not result in early reperfusion in approximately 25% of patients. We hypothesized that early repeated thrombolysis with rt-PA in patients with early failed reperfusion would result in myocardial reperfusion. Fifty-nine AMI patients with a symptom delay of <6 h, treated with SK were included. ECG was taken on admission and after 90 and 180 min. An ST recovery of > or =25% at 90 min was interpreted as successful reperfusion. Sixteen patients had failed reperfusion at 90 min and were randomized to repeated thrombolysis with rt-PA or placebo. At 180 min from SK start, ST recovery was higher in the placebo group than in the rt-PA group (71 vs. 40%, p = 0.05). No serious bleeding complications were observed. Due to the limited sample size it was not possible to draw prominent conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gill et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: