Key result
Shorter pulse durations of 2.5-15 msec had significantly lower energy thresholds for defibrillation than 20 msec shocks (P<0.05), with midrange shocks offering the best combination of requirements.
Why the study?
What is the optimal pulse duration for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation using truncated monophasic pulses in a canine model?
Population
6 anesthetized dogs
Comparison
Truncated monophasic pulses of 2.5-20 msec in… vs Different pulse durations compared against each…
Design
Preclinical, Various durations were tested randomly
Authors
Loading...
Animal results should not change clinical defibrillation practice; leaves optimal pulse duration open for human trials.
What is the optimal pulse duration for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation using truncated monophasic pulses in a canine model?
p-value: p=<0.05
Midrange pulse durations (5-15 msec) provide the optimal combination of low average current and energy requirements for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in a canine model.
Chapman et al. (1988) studied Induced fibrillation (n=6). Truncated monophasic pulses of varying durations vs. Different pulse durations compared to each other was evaluated on Minimum peak voltage and energy resulting in defibrillation (p=<0.05). Shorter pulse durations of 2.5-15 msec had significantly lower energy thresholds for defibrillation than 20 msec shocks (P<0.05), with midrange shocks offering the best combination of requirements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: