Key result
Higher submaximal exercise DBP linked to ~26% higher heart failure risk per SD.
Why the study?
Exercise stress tests are conventionally used to assess coronary artery disease risk, but the relationship between blood pressure and heart rate responses during and after submaximal exercise and incident heart failure was unknown.
Are blood pressure and heart rate responses to submaximal exercise associated with the incidence of heart failure in community-dwelling adults?
Cohort (n=2,066)
No
Are blood pressure and heart rate responses to submaximal exercise associated with the incidence of heart failure in community-dwelling adults?
Hazard Ratio: 1.26 (95% CI 1.01–1.59)
p-value: p=0.043
Hemodynamic responses to submaximal exercise, specifically higher diastolic blood pressure and slower systolic blood pressure recovery, serve as independent markers of future heart failure risk.
Higher exercise diastolic BP may flag HFrEF risk in community adults; leaves open validation beyond Framingham and incremental utility over resting measures.
Background Exercise stress tests are conventionally performed to assess risk of coronary artery disease. Using the FHS (Framingham Heart Study) Offspring cohort, we related blood pressure (BP) and heart rate responses during and after submaximal exercise to the incidence of heart failure (HF). Methods and Results We evaluated Framingham Offspring Study participants (n=2066; mean age, 58 years; 53% women) who completed 2 stages of an exercise test (Bruce protocol) at their seventh examination (1998-2002). We measured pulse pressure, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and heart rate responses during stage 2 exercise (2.5 mph at 12% grade). We calculated the changes in systolic BP, diastolic BP, and heart rate from stage 2 to recovery 3 minutes after exercise. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to relate each standardized exercise variable (during stage 2, and at 3 minutes of recovery) individually to HF incidence, adjusting for standard risk factors. On follow-up (median, 16.8 years), 85 participants developed new-onset HF. Higher exercise diastolic BP was associated with higher HF with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction <50%) risk (hazard ratio [HR] per SD increment, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.59). Lower stage 2 pulse pressure and rapid postexercise recovery of heart rate and systolic BP were associated with higher HF with reduced ejection fraction risk (HR per SD increment, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57-0.94]; 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35-0.76]; and 0.63 [95% CI, 0.47-0.84], respectively). BP and heart rate responses to submaximal exercise were not associated with risk of HF with preserved ejection fraction (ejection fraction ≥50%). Conclusions Accentuated diastolic BP during exercise with slower systolic BP and heart rate recovery after exercise are markers of HF with reduced ejection fraction risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carneiro et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Incident heart failure (n=2,066). Higher stage 2 exercise diastolic blood pressure vs. Lower stage 2 exercise diastolic blood pressure was evaluated on Incident heart failure (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.59, p=0.043). Higher diastolic blood pressure during submaximal exercise was associated with a higher risk of incident heart failure (HR 1.26 per standard deviation increment).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: