Key result
H-FABP testing improved diagnostic accuracy for suspected acute coronary syndrome over clinical findings and ECG (P<0.001), but provided no additional value when hs-cTnT measurements were available.
Why the study?
Does H-FABP testing improve diagnostic accuracy for acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department when added to clinical findings, ECG, and hs-cTnT?
Observational (n=453)
No
Does H-FABP testing improve diagnostic accuracy for acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department when added to clinical findings, ECG, and hs-cTnT?
p-value: p=<0.001
H-FABP testing does not provide additional diagnostic value for acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department when high-sensitivity troponin-T is available.
H-FABP adds no diagnostic value beyond hs-cTnT; supports limiting its use in contemporary ED settings but leaves open utility where troponin access is limited.
BACKGROUND: Timely recognition of acute coronary syndrome remains a challenge as many biomarkers, including troponin, remain negative in the first hours following the onset of chest pain. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), a cardiac biomarker with potential value immediately post symptom onset. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective monocentre diagnostic accuracy study of H-FABP bedside point of care (CardioDetect®) and ELISA tests in acute coronary syndrome suspected patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset to the emergency department, in addition to clinical findings, electrocardiography and the currently recommended biomarker high sensitivity troponin-T (hs-cTnT). The final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists, blinded to H-FABP results. Acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 149 (32.9%) of 453 unselected patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (56% men, mean age 62.6 years). Negative predictive values were similar for H-FABP point of care and ELISA tests (79% vs. 78% respectively), but inferior to initial hs-cTnT (negative predictive value 86%). The addition of H-FABP point of care results to hs-cTnT increased the negative predictive value to 89%. In a multivariable logistic regression model, H-FABP point of care and ELISA tests yielded relevant diagnostic information in addition to clinical findings and ECG (likelihood ratio test p<0.001) and increased area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC; 0.82 vs. 0.84 and 0.84). This added value attenuated, however, after inclusion of hs-cTnT in the diagnostic model (AUC 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department, H-FABP testing improves diagnostic accuracy in addition to clinical findings and electrocardiography. H-FABP, however, has no additional diagnostic value when hs-cTnT measurements are also available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bank et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=453). H-FABP point of care and ELISA tests vs. hs-cTnT was evaluated on Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (p=<0.001). H-FABP testing improved diagnostic accuracy for suspected acute coronary syndrome over clinical findings and ECG (P<0.001), but provided no additional value when hs-cTnT measurements were available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: