Why the study?
Does point-of-care H-FABP testing improve diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction compared to hs-TnT in emergency patients at high risk for acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=1,302)
Yes
Does point-of-care H-FABP testing improve diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction compared to hs-TnT in emergency patients at high risk for acute coronary syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 52.9%
Point-of-care H-FABP testing has lower overall diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction compared to hs-TnT in high-risk patients, though performance may be similar within 3 hours of chest pain onset.
NOAC uptake rose in new Belgian AF diagnoses; leaves open real-world outcome effects versus VKA.
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is used to detect myocardial damage in patients with acute chest pain. Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) may be an alternative, available as point-of-care test. METHODS: Patients (n=203) referred by general practitioners for suspected acute coronary syndrome or presenting with typical chest pain and one major cardiovascular risk factor at the emergency department were prospectively included in a single-centre cohort study. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) and point-of-care H-FABP testing were concomitantly performed at admission and after 6h. RESULTS: Maximal hs-TnT levels above the 99th percentile were observed in 152 patients (75%) with 127 (63%) fulfilling criteria for myocardial infarction. Upon admission, hs-TnT and H-FABP were associated with an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.77-0.89) and 0.79 (0.73-0.85), respectively, to predict myocardial infarction, which increased to 0.93 (0.90-0.97) and 0.88 (0.84-0.93), respectively, after 6h. The diagnostic accuracy for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was somewhat lower with an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.72-0.87), 0.90 (0.84-0.96), 0.73 (0.64-0.81) and 0.77 (0.67-0.86), respectively. When assessment was performed within 3h of chest pain onset, diagnostic accuracy of H-FABP versus hs-TnT was similar. Each standard deviation increase in admission H-FABP was associated with a 68% relative risk increase of all-cause mortality (p-value=0.027) during 666 ± 155 days of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care H-FABP testing has lower diagnostic accuracy compared with hs-TnT assessment in patients with high pre-test acute coronary syndrome probability, but might be of interest when assessment is possible early after chest pain onset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kellens et al. (2015) conducted an observational in newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=1,302). Antithrombotic therapies (NOACs vs VKA) vs. Historical cohorts (2012-2013 vs 2014-2015) was evaluated on Use of Non-Vitamin-K-Anticoagulants (NOACs).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: