Key result
In an in vitro left heart model of double valve replacement, mono-leaflet mechanical heart valves produced physiological flow patterns but higher energy loss compared to bi-leaflet valves.
Why the study?
The study was designed to elucidate the flow features evolving within the ventricle of a beating left heart model representing double valve replacement with mechanical heart valves.
Does aortic valve orientation affect left ventricular flow patterns and energy loss in an in vitro double valve replacement model?
Does aortic valve orientation affect left ventricular flow patterns and energy loss in an in vitro double valve replacement model?
In an in vitro double valve replacement model, the orientation of the aortic mechanical heart valve significantly impacts left ventricular flow dynamics and energy loss, suggesting clinical importance of AV positioning during surgery.
Aortic valve orientation may affect LV energetics in double replacement; leaves open clinical outcome impact.
The present study elucidates the flow features evolving within the ventricle of a beating left heart model with two mechanical heart valves (MHVs) fixed in mitral and aortic positions. This configuration represents the clinical case of double valve replacement (DVR). Two types of MHVs were used – bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) and mono-leaflet mechanical heart valve (MMHV). Leaflets of MHVs in the mitral position were aligned to mimic closely that of the anatomical mitral valve, whereas in the aortic position their alignment was varied in two different orientations. A 2D Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique was used to explore flow details in the mid-coronal plane of the left ventricle (LV) for 50 cardiac cycles. The heartbeat was simulated at the rate of 60 cycles per minute maintaining the ejection fraction of 45%. In BMHV cases, both the orientations of the aortic valve (AV) produced entirely different non-physiological flow patterns. But in MMHV cases both the orientations of the aortic valve produced flow patterns similar to the physiological flow patterns. The LV contraction during systole exhibited a strong dependence on the AV orientation. Energy loss (EL) due to viscous dissipation, obtained from the strain rate, shows that phase-wise distribution over a complete cardiac cycle is affected by the AV orientation, but the net integrated values show only a marginal difference for BMHV whereas a significant difference for MMHV. Based on the findings, this study suggests that consideration of the AV orientation is important for better LV performance in the DVR conditions and hence for post-surgical cardiac health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harikrishnan et al. (2022) studied Double valve replacement (DVR). Mechanical Heart Valve orientation (BMHV vs MMHV) vs. Different valve orientations was evaluated on Energy loss and flow pattern. In an in vitro left heart model of double valve replacement, mono-leaflet mechanical heart valves produced physiological flow patterns but higher energy loss compared to bi-leaflet valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: