Key result
An O-shaped mitral annulus generated a 25% stronger vortical structure and higher energy dissipation rates compared to a D-shaped annulus in an experimental left heart simulator.
Why the study?
Does a D-shaped mitral annulus reduce energy loss during ventricular filling compared to an O-shaped annulus in a left heart simulator?
Does a D-shaped mitral annulus reduce energy loss during ventricular filling compared to an O-shaped annulus in a left heart simulator?
A D-shaped mitral annulus reduces dissipative energy losses during ventricular filling compared to an O-shaped annulus, which may inform the design of prosthetic mitral valves.
D-shaped annuli may reduce filling energy dissipation; leaves open prosthetic valve design implications.
The mitral valve (MV) is a bileaflet valve positioned between the left atrium and ventricle of the heart. The annulus of the MV has been observed to undergo geometric changes during the cardiac cycle, transforming from a saddle D-shape during systole to a flat (and less eccentric) D-shape during diastole. Prosthetic MV devices, including heart valves and annuloplasty rings, are designed based on these two configurations, with the circular design of some prosthetic heart valves (PHVs) being an approximation of the less eccentric, flat D-shape. Characterizing the effects of these geometrical variations on the filling efficiency of the left ventricle (LV) is required to understand why the flat D-shaped annulus is observed in the native MV during diastole in addition to optimizing the design of prosthetic devices. We hypothesize that the D-shaped annulus reduces energy loss during ventricular filling. An experimental left heart simulator (LHS) consisting of a flexible-walled LV physical model was used to characterize the filling efficiency of the two mitral annular geometries. The strength of the dominant vortical structure formed and the energy dissipation rate (EDR) of the measured fields, during the diastolic period of the cardiac cycle, were used as metrics to quantify the filling efficiency. Our results indicated that the O-shaped annulus generates a stronger (25% relative to the D-shaped annulus) vortical structure than that of the D-shaped annulus. It was also found that the O-shaped annulus resulted in higher EDR values throughout the diastolic period of the cardiac cycle. The results support the hypothesis that a D-shaped mitral annulus reduces dissipative energy losses in ventricular filling during diastole and in turn suggests that a symmetric stent design does not provide lower filling efficiency than an equivalent asymmetric design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okafor et al. (2015) studied this question. D-shaped mitral annulus vs. O-shaped mitral annulus was evaluated on Filling efficiency (strength of dominant vortical structure and energy dissipation rate). An O-shaped mitral annulus generated a 25% stronger vortical structure and higher energy dissipation rates compared to a D-shaped annulus in an experimental left heart simulator.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: