Key result
Diabetes mellitus and increased left atrial volume index independently predicted impaired coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
Why the study?
Is impaired coronary flow reserve associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals with major cardiovascular risk factors?
Cross-Sectional (n=99)
Is impaired coronary flow reserve associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals with major cardiovascular risk factors?
Impaired coronary flow reserve is common in asymptomatic individuals with cardiovascular risk factors and is associated with early echocardiographic signs of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support closer monitoring in diabetics with risk factors; leaves open causal links to diastolic progression.
AIM: The aims of this study were to evaluate: i) the prevalence of impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR), ii) the association of impaired CFR with indices of left ventricular function, and iii) the independent predictors of impaired CFR in a cohort of high-risk asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive individuals (age, 52.5 ± 13.2 years; 68% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 62 ± 6%) with at least one major cardiovascular risk factor (49% hypertension, 23% diabetes mellitus, 42% hypercholesterolemia, 32% smoking) were evaluated. Based on CFR values, patients were divided into normal (CFR ≥2.5), borderline (2.5>CFR ≥2.0), and abnormal (CFR < 2.0). Left ventricular function was assessed with comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Impaired CFR was identified in 39 individuals (borderline, n = 25; abnormal, n = 14). Isovolumic relaxation time was significantly increased for abnormal compared with normal CFR (94 ± 12 vs. 85 ± 11 msec, p < 0.05), as was the left atrial volume index (LAVI) (24 ± 7 cm(3)/m(2) vs. 19.1 ± 5.2, p < 0.01). A stepwise linear regression analysis identified the LAVI and the deceleration time of E wave of transmitral flow as the only independent predictors of CFR value. An ordinal regression analysis model revealed two predictors of CFR categorization: diabetes mellitus (proportional odds ratio (POR) for CFR group deterioration, 4.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13-18.28; p = 0.033) and LAVI (POR, 1.11 per 1 cm(3)/m(2) increment; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: CFR is often impaired among asymptomatic individuals with major cardiovascular risk factors and is associated with changes in left ventricular diastolic function and left atrial size. The prognostic importance of these early derangements should be assessed in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karayannis et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic with major cardiovascular risk factors (n=99). Diabetes mellitus vs. No diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Coronary flow reserve (CFR) group deterioration (POR 4.55, 95% CI 1.13-18.28, p=0.033). Diabetes mellitus and increased left atrial volume index independently predicted impaired coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: