Key result
Left ventricular stimulation significantly decreased intracardiac impedance peak-to-peak amplitude compared to intrinsic conduction in both Z1 (P=0.021) and Z2 (P=0.022) configurations.
Why the study?
Can multiple vector intracardiac impedance measurements be used to monitor hemodynamic variations during different pacing modes in heart failure patients?
Can multiple vector intracardiac impedance measurements be used to monitor hemodynamic variations during different pacing modes in heart failure patients?
Multiple vector intracardiac impedance measurements during biventricular pacing correlate with hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables, suggesting feasibility for hemodynamic monitoring.
May enable impedance monitoring of pacing effects in HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Intracardiac impedance (ICZ) has been known to reflect contractile capacity of the heart, and a strong relationship has been documented between stroke volume and ICZ. In this pilot study, conducted in heart failure patients during implantation of a biventricular device, we investigated acute changes in multiple vector ICZ signals during different pacing modes, and whether ICZ can be used to monitor hemodynamic variations. METHODS: Z1 and Z2 impedance signals were recorded in the right ventricle (RV), and between the left ventricle (LV) and RV, respectively, in 12 patients during four programming modes. ICZ signals were analyzed with respect to average and peak-to-peak (p2p) amplitude and systolic slope, and correlated with noninvasive hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: ICZ p2p amplitude decreased during LV stimulation both in Z1 and in Z2 configuration (P = 0.021 and P = 0.022 vs intrinsic conduction, respectively). No significant variations in average amplitude or systolic slope were observed. ICZ variables correlated directly with hemodynamic measures (r = 0.48, P < 0.05, between Z2 p2p amplitude and pulse pressure), LV ejection fraction (r = 0.32, P < 0.05, for Z1 average amplitude), RV ejection fraction (r = 0.75, P < 0.05, for Z1 p2p amplitude), and inversely with ventricular volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in ICZ may be observed during different pacing modes and seem to correlate with hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables. Multiple vector ICZ measurement may be a feasible tool for hemodynamic assessment in patients treated with biventricular pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valzania et al. (2009) studied Heart failure (n=12). Left ventricular stimulation (different pacing modes) vs. Intrinsic conduction was evaluated on Acute changes in multiple vector intracardiac impedance (ICZ) signals (p=0.021). Left ventricular stimulation significantly decreased intracardiac impedance peak-to-peak amplitude compared to intrinsic conduction in both Z1 (P=0.021) and Z2 (P=0.022) configurations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: