Key result
This systematic review summarizes current data on the optimization of sequential (V-V delay) compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing in heart failure, without reporting quantitative results.
Why the study?
Does optimization of sequential (V-V delay) biventricular pacing improve outcomes compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with systolic heart failure?
Systematic Review
Does optimization of sequential (V-V delay) biventricular pacing improve outcomes compared to simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with systolic heart failure?
This systematic review summarizes current data on the potential benefits of optimizing sequential versus simultaneous biventricular pacing in heart failure.
Biventricular pacing has been shown to improve the overall clinical outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure and ventricular conduction delay on electrocardiogram. As correction of ventricular dyssynchrony is the putative mechanism of benefit, biventricular pacing is also termed as cardiac resynchronization therapy. The development of separate programmability of right and left ventricular output has led to a growing number of reports on the potential benefit of optimization of cardiac resynchronization by sequential biventricular pacing with different techniques and endpoints. This systematic review summarizes the current data for the optimization of sequential (V-V delay) compared with (default) simultaneous biventricular pacing in heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure. Sequential (V-V delay) biventricular pacing vs. Simultaneous biventricular pacing was evaluated. This systematic review summarizes current data on the optimization of sequential (V-V delay) compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing in heart failure, without reporting quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: