Key result
Electrogram maximum derivatives DMAX and SMAX significantly decreased from the acute to chronic phase of pacemaker treatment (p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively).
Why the study?
How do electrogram derivatives, amplitudes, and impedance change from acute to chronic phases of permanent pacemaker treatment?
Population
71 cases during permanent pacemaker treatment
Comparison
Measurement of electrogram parameters and… vs Acute vs chronic phase; 8 mm2 vs 12 mm2 electrodes
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May raise demand failure risk in chronic pacing; hypothesis-generating for electrode optimization in observational cohorts.
Observational (n=71)
How do electrogram derivatives, amplitudes, and impedance change from acute to chronic phases of permanent pacemaker treatment?
p-value: p=<0.02; <0.01
Electrogram maximum derivatives decrease significantly from acute pacemaker implantation to chronic generator replacement, which combined with low Helmholtz capacity of small electrodes may increase the risk of demand failure.
Ole‐Jørgen Ohm (1979) conducted an observational in Permanent pacemaker treatment (n=71). Chronic phase of pacemaker treatment vs. Acute phase (first implantation) was evaluated on Electrogram maximum derivatives (DMAX, SMAX) (p=<0.02; <0.01). Electrogram maximum derivatives DMAX and SMAX significantly decreased from the acute to chronic phase of pacemaker treatment (p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: