Key result
Myocardial ischemia and 60 minutes of reperfusion increased chamber stiffness and myocardial stiffness in remote nonischemic myocardium compared to baseline.
Why the study?
Does myocardial ischemia and reperfusion increase regional chamber stiffness and myocardial stiffness in remote nonischemic myocardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs?
Does myocardial ischemia and reperfusion increase regional chamber stiffness and myocardial stiffness in remote nonischemic myocardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs?
In a canine model, the ischemia-induced increase in stiffness of remote nonischemic myocardium persists for at least 60 minutes after reperfusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change practice; hypothesis-generating for persistent remote myocardial stiffening after reperfusion.
During and after an ischemic injury, maintenance and recovery of cardiac function may critically depend on remote nonischemic myocardium.Graded myocardial ischemia is associated with an approximately 50% increase in stiffness of nonischemic myocardium. We determined whether this increase in stiffness is unique to the ischemic period or persists during reperfusion. Ten anesthetized (isoflurane 1.0% vol/vol) open-chest dogs were instrumented to measure left ventricular pressure and dimensions (sonomicrometry) in ischemic and nonischemic myocardium. Regional chamber stiffness and myocardial stiffness were assessed using the enddiastolic pressure-length relationship which was modified by stepwise infusion and withdrawal of 200 mL of the animals' own blood during baseline, 45 min low flow ischemia (systolic bulge), and 60 min after the onset of reperfusion. In remote nonischemic myocardium, regional myocardial ischemia was associated with a significant (P < 0.05) increase in chamber stiffness (+44%) and myocardial stiffness (+48%). Sixty minutes after the onset of reperfusion, chamber stiffness (+54%, P < 0.05 versus baseline) and myocardial stiffness (+55%, P < 0.05 versus baseline) remained increased. Thus, the ischemia-induced increase in stiffness of remote nonischemic myocardium persists for at least 60 min after reperfusion. (Anesth Analg 1996;82:695-701)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Märsch et al. (1996) studied Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (n=10). Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion vs. Baseline was evaluated on Chamber stiffness and myocardial stiffness in remote nonischemic myocardium (p=<0.05). Myocardial ischemia and 60 minutes of reperfusion increased chamber stiffness and myocardial stiffness in remote nonischemic myocardium compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: