Key result
Having three CVD risk factors is linked to ~44% lower odds of optimal risk-factor control.
Why the study?
The extent to which greater cardiovascular disease risk factor burden relates to risk factor control in a contemporary, diverse Hispanic/Latino population is not well-understood.
Does a higher burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors reduce the likelihood of optimal risk factor control in Hispanic/Latino adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,521)
Yes
Does a higher burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors reduce the likelihood of optimal risk factor control in Hispanic/Latino adults?
Odds Ratio: 0.56 (95% CI 0.4–0.8)
p-value: p=0.001
Hispanic/Latino adults with multiple cardiovascular risk factors are paradoxically less likely to achieve optimal control of these factors, highlighting a critical target population for primary prevention efforts.
Greater risk factor burden was associated with poorer control in Hispanic/Latino adults; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for targeted interventions.
BACKGROUND: Presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (RFs) should prompt patients and their providers to work aggressively towards controlling those that are modifiable. The extent to which a greater CVD RF burden is related to CVD RF control in a contemporary and diverse Hispanic/Latino population is not well-understood. METHODS: Using multicenter community-based data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, we assessed the self-reported prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and prevalent CVD (ischemic heart disease or stroke). We used contemporaneous guidelines to define RF control. Multivariable logistic regression for complex survey sampling was used to examine whether having more CVD RFs was associated with CVD RF control (adjusting for age, sex, Hispanic background group, education, and health insurance). RESULTS: Our sample included 8521 participants with at least one CVD RF or prevalent CVD. The mean age in HCHS/SOL target population was 49 (SE 0.3) years and 56% were women. Frequency of one, two, or three self-reported CVD RFs was 57%, 26%, 8%, respectively, and overall 9% of participants had prevalent CVD. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, compared to those reporting one CVD RF, individuals with three CVD RFs were the least likely to have blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose optimally controlled (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.80). However, those with prevalent CVD were more likely to have all three risk factors controlled, (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.01-2.01). CONCLUSION: Hispanic/Latino adults with three major CVD RFs represent a group with poor overall CVD RF control. Secondary CVD prevention fares better. The potential contributors to inadequate CVD RF control in this highly vulnerable group warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk factors (n=8,521). Three cardiovascular disease risk factors vs. One cardiovascular disease risk factor was evaluated on Complete control of all 3 risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose) (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80, p=0.001). Compared to individuals with one cardiovascular disease risk factor, Hispanic/Latino adults with three major risk factors had 44% lower odds of having their blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose optimally controlled (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: