Key result
Moderate/severe PVL post-TAVR linked to ~258% higher one-year mortality versus none or trace.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the severity of paravalvular leak and its association with 1-year mortality and other outcomes after TAVR with the Edwards Sapien valve in the combined PARTNER cohorts.
Does mild or moderate/severe paravalvular leak increase one-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR compared to none/trace leak?
Population
2270 TAVR patients with discharge or 7-day echocardiograms in the PARTNER trial
Comparison
Paravalvular leak graded as none/trace vs mild vs moderate or severe
Design
Cohort analysis of randomized and non-randomized trial cohorts
Follow-up
≥ 1yr
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“One of the unanswered questions is: How important is that? We know now from this report that in medium-risk patients, at 2 years, there was indeed significantly more paravalvular regurgitation with TAVR valves than surgery, but in only 8% was it moderate or greater. Most was mild or trace. Compared with previous experiences reported with a balloon-expandable valve, this is an improvement in the rate of paravalvular regurgitation. If you are in the 8% that is moderate or severe [paravalvular regurgitation], there is indeed impact on mortality, but in the mild group, it no longer appears to affect mortality, at least in this cohort.”
“When this trial was ongoing, we didn't have an appreciation that leaving these patients with paravalvular leaks, large leaks, was actually going to be bad for them. That's what we've learned actually from the PARTNER trials, that leaving them with a lot of leaks is a bad thing.”
“We have to be vigilant in not having moderate-to-severe PVR and if... for whatever reason we leave moderate-to-severe [PVR], we have to do other adjunctive therapies to decrease that. We've already shown that that'll be beneficial.”
Mild PVL post-TAVR may warrant closer surveillance; leaves open whether mitigation improves survival in prospective trials.
Cohort (n=2,270)
Yes
Does mild or moderate/severe paravalvular leak increase one-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR compared to none/trace leak?
Hazard Ratio: 3.58 (95% CI 2.42–5.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 34.1% vs 14.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Even mild paravalvular leak following TAVR is associated with a significantly increased risk of one-year all-cause and cardiac mortality.
Kodali et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Paravalvular leak following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=2,270). Moderate/severe paravalvular leak vs. None/trace paravalvular leak was evaluated on One-year all-cause mortality (HR 3.58, 95% CI 2.42-5.29, p=<0.0001). Following TAVR, moderate/severe (HR 3.58; 95% CI 2.42-5.29) and mild paravalvular leak (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.28-2.39) were associated with increased one-year all-cause mortality compared to none/trace.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: