Key result
Manual measurement of QRS duration showed clinically acceptable interobserver variation, with an absolute mean difference of 2 ms in intrinsic rhythm and 3 ms in paced ECGs.
Why the study?
Interventricular pacing delay optimization can narrow QRS duration after CRT, raising interest in interobserver and intraobserver variation in manual QRS measurements.
Does manual measurement of QRS duration have acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for optimizing interventricular pacing delay in CRT patients?
Population
40 intrinsic 12-lead ECGs and 20 CRT patients with paced ECGs
Comparison
Interobserver and intraobserver variations in manual QRS duration measurements and VVd selection
Design
Observational reproducibility study
Authors
Loading...
Supports manual QRS measurement for CRT VVd optimization; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Observational (n=40)
Does manual measurement of QRS duration have acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for optimizing interventricular pacing delay in CRT patients?
Effect estimate: mean 2 ms (intrinsic), 3 ms (paced)
Manual measurement of QRS duration shows clinically acceptable inter- and intraobserver reproducibility, supporting its use for interventricular pacing delay optimization in CRT.
Stephansen et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients with LBBB (n=40). Manual measurement of QRS duration was evaluated on Absolute interobserver difference in measured QRS duration (mean 2 ms (intrinsic), 3 ms (paced)). Manual measurement of QRS duration showed clinically acceptable interobserver variation, with an absolute mean difference of 2 ms in intrinsic rhythm and 3 ms in paced ECGs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: