Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 6, 2018Annals of Noninvasive ElectrocardiologyOpen Access

Reproducibility of measuring QRS duration and implications for optimization of interventricular pacing delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Manual measurement of QRS duration showed clinically acceptable interobserver variation, with an absolute mean difference of 2 ms in intrinsic rhythm and 3 ms in paced ECGs.

Why the study?

Interventricular pacing delay optimization can narrow QRS duration after CRT, raising interest in interobserver and intraobserver variation in manual QRS measurements.

Does manual measurement of QRS duration have acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for optimizing interventricular pacing delay in CRT patients?

Population

40 intrinsic 12-lead ECGs and 20 CRT patients with paced ECGs

Comparison

Interobserver and intraobserver variations in manual QRS duration measurements and VVd selection

Design

Observational reproducibility study

Authors

Charlotte StephansenCharlotte StephansenElectrophysiologyMKMads Brix KronborgElectrophysiologyCWChristoffer Tobias WittAarhus University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports manual QRS measurement for CRT VVd optimization; leaves open prospective outcome validation.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=40)

Structured PICO

Does manual measurement of QRS duration have acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for optimizing interventricular pacing delay in CRT patients?

P
Population
40 intrinsic ECGs and 20 CRT patients evaluated for inter- and intraobserver variation in QRS duration measurements.
E
Exposure
Manual measurement of QRS duration by multiple observers to determine interobserver and intraobserver variation, and selection of optimal interventricular pacing delay (VVd)
O
Outcome
Variation in intrinsic and paced QRS duration measurements (interobserver and intraobserver) and agreement in selecting the narrowest QRS (optimal VVd)surrogate

Main Result

Effect estimate: mean 2 ms (intrinsic), 3 ms (paced)

Manual measurement of QRS duration shows clinically acceptable inter- and intraobserver reproducibility, supporting its use for interventricular pacing delay optimization in CRT.

Cite This Study

Stephansen et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients with LBBB (n=40). Manual measurement of QRS duration was evaluated on Absolute interobserver difference in measured QRS duration (mean 2 ms (intrinsic), 3 ms (paced)). Manual measurement of QRS duration showed clinically acceptable interobserver variation, with an absolute mean difference of 2 ms in intrinsic rhythm and 3 ms in paced ECGs.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a28eb318e8b9f80fb9ff488https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12621

Topics

EchocardiographyHFrEF treatmentHeart failure
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accuracy of manual QRS duration assessment: its importance in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy2009 · 42 citations
  2. 2Surface Electrocardiogram to Predict Outcome in Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Sub-Analysis of the CARE-HF Trial2009 · 246 citations
  3. 3Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)2011 · 840 citations
  4. 4Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide2016 · 314 citations
  5. 52013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)2013 · 1,135 citations