Key result
Existing coronary risk scores show poor diagnostic accuracy for predicting AKI after TAVI.
Why the study?
AKI after TAVI is frequent and worsens outcomes, but risk scores developed to predict AKI in coronary settings had not been tested in a large TAVI population.
Do currently available coronary AKI risk scores adequately predict acute kidney injury in patients undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=1,535)
Yes
Do currently available coronary AKI risk scores adequately predict acute kidney injury in patients undergoing TAVI?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.604 (95% CI 0.58-0.63)
p-value: p=<0.001
Current AKI risk scores developed for coronary interventions are inadequately predictive in the TAVI population, underscoring the necessity to develop TAVI-specific prognostic models.
Coronary AKI scores should not guide TAVI risk assessment; leaves open need for dedicated TAVI-specific models.
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a frequent complication associated with adverse outcomes and mortality. Various scores have been developed to predict this complication in the coronary setting. However, none have ever been tested in a large TAVI population. This study aimed to evaluate the power of four different scores in predicting AKI after TAVI. METHODS: , and ACEF scores were calculated retrospectively. RESULTS: The patients who developed TAVI-related AKI had significantly higher absolute values of all risk scores than those who did not. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis also showed a significant correlation between these four scores and AKI, but without a significant difference among all of them (p value = 0.176). Nevertheless, based on their area under the curve values (≤0.604 for all), none had adequate diagnostic accuracy in predicting TAVI-related AKI. Importantly, multivariate analysis identified myocardial revascularization close to the TAVI procedure and implantation of self-expanding prostheses, as well as atrial fibrillation, low-osmolar contrast media administration, corrected contrast medium volume, and any transfusion (p value < 0.05 for all) as independent risk factors for AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Although high values of current AKI risk scores are significantly associated with the development of this complication, these are not sufficiently accurate. Further studies are needed so that a TAVI-dedicated AKI risk score may be created.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loizzi et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=1,535). Currently available coronary AKI risk scores (Mehran, WBH, CR4EATME3AD3, ACEF) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of the WBH score for predicting TAVI-related acute kidney injury (highest accuracy among tested scores) (AUC 0.604, 95% CI 0.58-0.63, p=<0.001). Currently available coronary AKI risk scores demonstrated inadequate diagnostic accuracy for predicting acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation, with all scores yielding an AUC of 0.604 or less.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: