Key result
Percutaneous manipulation of prosthetic mitral valves successfully restored valve motion and reduced average peak gradients from 38 to 12 mm Hg in all 5 patients who had failed thrombolytic therapy.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous manipulation improve valve motion and resolve symptoms in patients with prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis who fail thrombolysis?
Case Report (n=5)
No
Does percutaneous manipulation improve valve motion and resolve symptoms in patients with prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis who fail thrombolysis?
Percutaneous mechanical manipulation of thrombosed prosthetic mitral valves is a feasible and safe alternative to surgery in selected patients who do not respond to thrombolytic therapy.
Hypothesis-generating for percutaneous manipulation after failed thrombolysis; should not yet change practice pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: Thrombosis of a prosthetic valve is a serious complication in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Thrombolysis is the initial choice of treatment. Patients who do not respond to thrombolysis are subjected to surgery which carries a high risk. We report a case series of 5 patients with prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis who did not respond to thrombolysis and were subjected to percutaneous manipulation of the prosthetic valves successfully and improved. METHODS: Five patients who were diagnosed to have prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis and failed to respond to a minimum of 36 h of thrombolysis (persistent symptoms with increased gradients, abnormal findings on fluoroscopy),were subjected to percutaneous treatment after receiving proper consent. None of them had a visible thrombus on transthoracic echocardiogram. All patients underwent transseptal puncture following which a 6F JR4 guiding catheter was passed into the left atrium. The valve leaflets were repeatedly hit gently under fluoroscopic guidance till they regained their normal mobility. RESULTS: Mean age was 38.8 years. Average peak and mean gradients prior to the procedure were 38 and 25 and after the procedure were 12 and 6 mm of Hg respectively. All patients had successful recovery of valve motion on fluoroscopy with normalization of gradients and complete resolution of symptoms. None of the patients had any focal neurological deficits, embolic manifestations or bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous manipulation of prosthetic valves in selected patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis who do not respond to thrombolytic therapy is feasible and can be used as an alternative to surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vuppaladadhiam Hariram (2014) conducted a case report in Prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis (n=5). Percutaneous manipulation of prosthetic valve was evaluated on Recovery of valve motion and normalization of gradients. Percutaneous manipulation of prosthetic mitral valves successfully restored valve motion and reduced average peak gradients from 38 to 12 mm Hg in all 5 patients who had failed thrombolytic therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: