Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study estimates in-hospital mortality in Thailand, indicating evolving risk factors over time.
BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) in Thailand, where high-risk HLA alleles are prevalent, remain limited. Existing prognostic scores, including SCORTEN, may not capture all mortality determinants. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality in adult patients with SJS/TEN in Thailand. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide Thai National Health Security Office database. Adults hospitalized with SJS/TEN were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes between 2017 and 2024. Cox regression with time-varying coefficients was used to examine mortality risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 7237 incident cases were identified (83.9% SJS). Median age was 57 years (interquartile range 42-69), and 50.5% were female. The estimated incidence was 17.3/million (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9-17.7), with a decline over time. In-hospital mortality was 4.1% for SJS and 15.5% for TEN. Independent factors associated with mortality beyond SCORTEN included invasive ventilation (hazard ratio [HR], 14.99; 95% CI, 7.08-31.75), liver disease (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.13-5.46), renal disease (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.96-3.04), and myocardial infarction (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.19-3.04). Mortality risk also increased progressively with age (≥60 years) and varied by hospital type. Time-varying analysis showed that TEN, liver disease, and ventilation had the strongest early impact, whereas infections, particularly skin and soft tissue infections, emerged later (HR at day 28, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.37-5.09). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SJS/TEN in Thailand is high. Mortality is influenced by factors beyond established scoring systems, with effects that evolve over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wongjirattikarn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: