Key result
A combination of macrophage migration inhibitory factor, soluble ST2, and left ventricle ejection fraction significantly predicted adverse left ventricle remodeling six months after STEMI (AUC 0.864).
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and soluble ST2 in predicting left ventricular remodeling six months after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Do macrophage migration inhibitory factor and soluble ST2 predict left ventricle remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=134)
No
Do macrophage migration inhibitory factor and soluble ST2 predict left ventricle remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
The combination of macrophage migration inhibitory factor, soluble ST2, and LVEF provides a significant predictive model for adverse left ventricular remodeling 6 months after STEMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support post-STEMI biomarker risk models; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: The aim: To estimate the role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and soluble ST2 in predicting the left ventricle remodeling six months after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The study involved 134 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Occurrence of post-percutaneous coronary (PCI) intervention epicardial blood flow of TIMI <3 or myocardial blush grade 0-1 along with ST resolution <70% within 2 hours after PCI was qualified as the no-reflow condition. Left ventricle remodeling was defined after 6-months as an increase in left ventricle end-diastolic volume and/or end-systolic volume by more than 10%. RESULTS: Results: A logistic regression formula was evaluated. Included biomarkers were macrophage migration inhibitory factor and sST2, left ventricle ejection fraction: Y=exp(-39.06+0.82EF+0.096ST2+0.0028MIF) / (1+exp(-39.06+0.82EF+0.096ST2+0.0028MIF)). The estimated range is from 0 to 1 point. Less than 0.5 determines an adverse outcome, and more than 0.5 is a good prognosis. This equation, with sensitivity of 77 % and specificity of 85%, could predict the development of adverse left ventricle remodeling six months after a coronary event (AUC=0.864, CI 0.673 to 0.966, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: A combination of biomarkers gives a significant predicting result in the formation of adverse left ventricular remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vyshnevska et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=134). Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and soluble ST2 (sST2) was evaluated on Left ventricle remodeling (increase in LVEDV and/or ESV by >10%) at 6 months (AUC 0.864, 95% CI 0.673-0.966, p=0.0001). A combination of macrophage migration inhibitory factor, soluble ST2, and left ventricle ejection fraction significantly predicted adverse left ventricle remodeling six months after STEMI (AUC 0.864).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: