Key result
TTVI cuts 1-year all-cause mortality ~46% vs. medical therapy.
Why the study?
Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention has shown safety and efficacy in high-risk patients with tricuspid regurgitation, prompting a reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis comparing its clinical benefit with medical therapy.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention reduce all-cause mortality in patients with symptomatic moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation compared to medical therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=3,826)
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention reduce all-cause mortality in patients with symptomatic moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation compared to medical therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.54 (95% CI 0.39–0.74)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.9% vs 31.2%
p-value: p=0.0001
Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention significantly improves 1-year overall survival compared to medical therapy in patients with symptomatic moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation.
Supports TTVI over medical therapy for lower mortality in tricuspid regurgitation; extends pooled evidence for transcatheter intervention.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating high-risk patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The authors aimed to perform a meta-analysis based on reconstructed time-to-event data to compare the clinical benefit of TTVI with medical therapy (MED). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in major databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, until 20 October 2023. All studies comparing the outcomes between TTVI and MED were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included heart failure (HF) hospitalization and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. RESULTS: Five studies covering 3826 patients (1146 received TTVI and 2680 received MED) were identified. At 1-year follow-up, TTVI significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality compared with MED [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39-0.74, P=0.0001]. There was a trend in favor of TTVI in HF hospitalization, although without significant difference (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.42-1.18, P=0.18). TTVI was also associated with a decreased risk of composite outcome (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86, P=0.007). Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated a 1-year overall survival rate of 83.1% in the TTVI group and 68.8% in the MED group. The subgroup analysis of device types yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MED, TTVI was associated with greater 1-year benefits for patients with symptomatic moderate or greater TR from the aspects of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (n=3,826). Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) vs. Medical therapy (MED) was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.74, p=0.0001). Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention significantly reduced the 1-year risk of all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.74; P=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: