Why the study?
Up to 30% of selected heart failure patients do not benefit clinically from CRT, and LV wall thickness analyzed by CT has rarely been evaluated regarding response to CRT and MR improvement.
Does left ventricular wall thickness assessed by pre-procedural cardiac CT predict clinical, echocardiographic, and prognostic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=54)
No
Does left ventricular wall thickness assessed by pre-procedural cardiac CT predict clinical, echocardiographic, and prognostic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pre-procedural CT assessment of left ventricular wall thickness can help stratify which patients are most likely to experience clinical, echocardiographic, and prognostic benefits from cardiac resynchronization therapy.
AIMS: Up to 30% of selected heart failure patients do not benefit clinically from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) analysed using computed tomography (CT) has rarely been evaluated in response to CRT and mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement. We examined the association of LVWT and the ability to reverse LV remodelling and MR improvement after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients scheduled for CRT underwent pre-procedural CT. Reduced LVWT was defined as WT <6 mm and quantified as a percentage of total LV area. Endpoints were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)], MR improvement and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of LVWT <6 mm area: ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50%. At 6 months, 75%, 71%, and 42% of the patients experienced NYHA improvement in the ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50% group, respectively. Additionally, ≤20% group presented higher LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (86%, 59%, and 83%, respectively). Both 20-50% and ≥50% groups exhibited a lower LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (52% and 42%; 47% and 45%; and 53% and 45%, respectively). Additionally, ≥25% of LVWT <6 mm inclusive of at least one papillary muscle insertion was the only predictor of lack of MR improvement. Lastly, ≥50% group experienced significantly lower 2-year MACE survival free probability. CONCLUSION: WT evaluated using CT could help to stratify the response to CRT and predict MR improvement and outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01097733.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galand et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Refractory heart failure (n=54). Left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) <6 mm area vs. Lower percentage of LVWT <6 mm area was evaluated on Lack of mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement at 6 months (OR 16.82, 95% CI 1).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: