Key result
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis had a 1-year mortality of 43%, but mortality was lower in patients subsequently undergoing TAVI (14%) or SAVR (19%) (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty remains an option for selected patients with severe aortic stenosis, but clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis needed evaluation.
What are the clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=167)
No
What are the clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis?
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty remains a viable bridge to definitive intervention in carefully selected patients with severe aortic stenosis, though mortality remains high in those who do not undergo subsequent definitive therapy.
BAV in severe AS shows high 1-year mortality especially with low EF; leaves open optimal selection and role pending prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a treatment option for the selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. We examined clinical outcomes and predictors of prognosis in patients undergoing BAV for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing BAV from January 2010 to March 2018 (n=167) at a single transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centre. Patient demographics, investigations, subsequent interventions and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic health records. RESULTS: Patients undergoing BAV were elderly (median age 80, IQR 73-86 years) and half (n=87, 52%) were male. All-cause mortality at 30 days and 12 months was 11% and 43%, respectively. Reduce ejection fraction (EF 30%-50%: HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.94; EF <30%: HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.20) was the only independent predictor at baseline of overall mortality. Median survival was 212 (IQR 54-490) days from the index procedure. Mortality at 1 year was lowest in patients who subsequently underwent TAVI or SAVR but high among those who had no further interventions or those who had a repeat BAV (14%, 19%, 60%, 89% respectively, log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSION: BAV as a bridge to definitive aortic valve intervention in carefully selected patients offers acceptable outcomes. These contemporary observational findings demonstrate the ongoing potential utility of BAV in the TAVI era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bularga et al. (2020) conducted an observational in severe aortic stenosis (n=167). Balloon aortic valvuloplasty was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 12 months. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis had a 1-year mortality of 43%, but mortality was lower in patients subsequently undergoing TAVI (14%) or SAVR (19%) (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: