Key result
Facility-based cardiac rehab yields higher adherence than home-based programs in heart failure in Kenya.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation programs do not exist in regions like Western Kenya despite heart failure causing high morbidity and mortality, so the feasibility of institution- and home-based models was evaluated.
Are institution-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation models feasible in patients with NYHA class II-III heart failure in Western Kenya?
Observational (n=100)
Open-label
Non-randomized
No
Are institution-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation models feasible in patients with NYHA class II-III heart failure in Western Kenya?
Institution-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation models are feasible for patients with heart failure in low-resource settings such as Western Kenya.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports cardiac rehabilitation feasibility in Western Kenyan HF; extends limited data but remains hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF), is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is known to improve functional capacity and reduce morbidity associated with HF. Although CR is a low-cost intervention, global access and adherence rates to CR remain poor. In regions such as Western Kenya, CR programs do not exist. We sought to establish the feasibility CR for HF in this region by testing adherence to institution and home-based models of CR. METHODS: One hundred participants with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and III HF symptoms were prospectively enrolled from a tertiary health facility in Western Kenya. Participants were non-randomly assigned to participate in one of two CR models based on their preference. Institution based cardiac rehabilitation (IBCR) comprised 36 facility-based exercise sessions over a period of 12 weeks. Home based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) comprised weekly pedometer guided exercise targets over a period of 12 weeks. An observational arm (OA) receiving usual care was also enrolled. The primary endpoint of CR feasibility was assessed based on study participants to adherence to at least 25% of exercise sessions. Secondary outcomes of change in NYHA symptom class, and six-minute walk time distance (6MWTD) were also evaluated. Data were summarized and analyzed as means (SD) and frequencies. Paired t-tests, Chi Square, Fisher's, and ANOVA tests were used for comparisons. FINDINGS: Mean protocol adherence was greater than 25% in both CR models; 46% ± 18 and 29% ± 11 (P < 0.05) among IBCR and HBCR participants respectively. Improvements by at least one NYHA class were observed among 71%, 41%, and 54%, of IBCR, HBCR and OA participants respectively. 6MWTD increased significantly by a mean of 31 ± 65 m, 40 ± 55 m and 38 ± 71 m in the IBCR, HBCR and OA respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IBCR and HBCR, are feasible rehabilitation models for HF in Western Kenya. Whereas improvement in functional capacity was observed, effectiveness of CR in this population remains unknown. Future randomized studies evaluating effect size, long term efficacy, and safety of cardiac rehabilitation in low resource settings such as Kenya are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngeno et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=100). Institution-based cardiac rehabilitation (IBCR) or Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs. Usual care (Observational arm) was evaluated on Mean protocol adherence of at least 25% of exercise sessions (p=<0.05). Institution-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation models proved feasible for patients with heart failure in Western Kenya, achieving mean protocol adherence rates of 46% and 29%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: