Key result
Adult congenital heart disease with heart failure was associated with significantly higher mortality (OR 1.4 for two-ventricle physiology), more emergency department admissions, and greater hospital costs compared to non-ACHD heart failure, despite less frequent use of advanced therapies like ventricular assist devices or transplantation.
Why the study?
Limited contemporary data exist regarding outcomes and resource use among adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure.
Does adult congenital heart disease increase mortality and resource use in patients with heart failure compared to non-congenital heart failure?
Observational (n=31,213,971)
Yes
Does adult congenital heart disease increase mortality and resource use in patients with heart failure compared to non-congenital heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 1.3–1.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.3% vs 5.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure experience higher mortality, greater resource utilization, and lower rates of advanced heart failure therapies compared to non-congenital heart failure patients.
OBJECTIVE: Limited contemporary data exist regarding outcomes and resource use among adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure (ACHD-HF). This study compared outcomes, emergency department (ED) and hospital resource use, and advanced heart failure (HF) therapies in ACHD-HF versus non-ACHD with HF (HF-non-ACHD). METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to analyse outcomes and resource use among ACHD-HF ED visits and hospitalisations from 2006 to 2016. ACHD-HF was stratified by single-ventricle (SV) and two-ventricle (2V) disease. RESULTS: A total of 76 557 ACHD-HF visits (3.6% SV physiology) and 31 137 414 HF-non-ACHD visits were analysed. ACHD-HFs were younger (SV 33 years (IQR 25-44), 2V 62 years (IQR 45-76); HF-non-ACHD 74 years (IQR 63-83); p<0.001). ACHD-HFs had higher ED admissions (78% vs 70%, p<0.001), longer hospital length of stay (5 days (IQR 2-8) vs 4 days (IQR 2-7), p<0.001) and greater hospital costs ($49K (IQR 2K-121K) vs $32K (17K-66K), p<0.001). Mortality was significantly higher among ACHD-HFs with SV physiology (6.6%; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.3) or 2V physiology (6.3%; OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.5) versus HF-non-ACHD (5.5%). ACHF-HF hospitalisations increased more (46% vs 6% HF-non-ACHD) over a 10-year period, but the proportion receiving ventricular assist device (VAD) (ACHD-HF -2% vs HF-non-ACHD 294%) or transplant (ACHD-HF -37% vs HF-non-ACHD 73%) decreased. CONCLUSION: ACHD-HFs have significant ED and hospital resource use that has increased over the past 10 years. However, advanced HF therapies (VAD and transplantation) are less commonly used compared with those without adult congenital heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burstein et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease (n=31,213,971). Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) vs. Non-ACHD with heart failure was evaluated on Mortality (two-ventricle ACHD-HF vs HF-non-ACHD) (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.5, p=<0.001). Adult congenital heart disease with heart failure was associated with significantly higher mortality (OR 1.4 for two-ventricle physiology), more emergency department admissions, and greater hospital costs compared to non-ACHD heart failure, despite less frequent use of advanced therapies like ventricular assist devices or transplantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: