Key result
Aortic propagation velocity did not correlate with classical aortic stiffness parameters such as aortic strain (r=-0.05, p=0.6) or aortic distensibility (r=-0.17, p=0.8) in healthy individuals.
Why the study?
Does aortic propagation velocity correlate with classical aortic stiffness parameters in healthy individuals?
Observational (n=97)
Does aortic propagation velocity correlate with classical aortic stiffness parameters in healthy individuals?
Effect estimate: r=-0.05 for AS; r=-0.17 for AD
p-value: p=0.6 for AS; 0.8 for AD
Aortic propagation velocity does not correlate with classical echocardiographic parameters of aortic stiffness in healthy individuals, suggesting its clinical applicability in low-risk populations requires further evaluation.
APV shows no link to aortic strain; leaves open its validity as elasticity marker pending prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: Aortic stiffness is an important cardiovascular risk marker, which can be determined using different noninvasive techniques. Aortic propagation velocity (APV) has recently been established as a novel echocardiographic parameter of aortic stiffness. This study aimed to investigate the association between APV and the classical echocardiography-derived aortic stiffness parameters, aortic distensibility (AD) and aortic strain (AS), in a group of otherwise healthy individuals. METHODS: In total, 97 consecutive healthy subjects were recruited in this observational study. APV was measured using color M-mode echocardiography from the suprasternal window in the descending aorta. AS and AD were calculated using clinical blood pressure and the M-mode echocardiography-derived aortic diameters. Correlation analyses were performed between cardiovascular risk factors related to increased aortic stiffness (age, obesity, and blood pressure) and measured stiffness parameters (APV, AS, and AD). Correlation analyses were also performed among the measured stiffness parameters. RESULTS: Good correlation of age, blood pressure, and BMI with AS and AD was observed. One-on-one correlation of age, blood pressure, and BMI with APV was not observed. No correlation was observed between APV and AS (r=-0.05, p=0.6) or between APV and AD (r=-0.17, p=0.8). CONCLUSION: Although APV has been proposed as a novel and practical echocardiographic parameter of aortic stiffness, especially in patients with coronary artery disease, correlations between classical stiffness parameters (AS and AD) and APV were absent in healthy individuals at low-intermediate risk. The clinical and research applicability of APV should be further evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatem Arı (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy individuals (n=97). Aortic propagation velocity (APV) vs. Classical aortic stiffness parameters (aortic distensibility and aortic strain) was evaluated on Correlation between APV and classical stiffness parameters (AS and AD) (r=-0.05 for AS; r=-0.17 for AD, p=0.6 for AS; 0.8 for AD). Aortic propagation velocity did not correlate with classical aortic stiffness parameters such as aortic strain (r=-0.05, p=0.6) or aortic distensibility (r=-0.17, p=0.8) in healthy individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: