Key result
Black adults face the highest HF risk, driven by clinical, social, and structural factors.
Why the study?
Heart failure incidence, prevalence, and clinical outcomes vary by race/ethnicity, driven by clinical, physiological, and social determinants of health alongside structural racism and implicit bias.
This review highlights the significant racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure incidence and outcomes in the US, emphasizing the role of social determinants of health and structural racism.
Highlights need to address social determinants in minority HF care; leaves open optimal interventions and mechanisms.
Heart failure (HF) affects >6 million Americans, with variations in incidence, prevalence, and clinical outcomes by race/ethnicity. Black adults have the highest risk for HF, with earlier age of onset and the highest risk of death and hospitalizations. The risk of hospitalizations for Hispanic patients is higher than White patients. Data on HF in Asian individuals are more limited. However, the higher burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, particularly among South Asian adults, is associated with increased risk of HF. The role of environmental, socioeconomic, and other social determinants of health, more likely for Black and Hispanic patients, are increasingly recognized as independent risk factors for HF and worse outcomes. Structural racism and implicit bias are drivers of health care disparities in the United States. This paper will review the clinical, physiological, and social determinants of HF risk, unique for race/ethnic minorities, and offer solutions to address systems of inequality that need to be recognized and dismantled/eradicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piña et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure. Race and ethnicity was evaluated. Heart failure affects >6 million Americans, with Black adults having the highest risk of onset, hospitalization, and death, driven by clinical factors, social determinants, and structural racism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: