Why the study?
Does isometric handgrip echocardiography differentiate normal from abnormal diastolic function in young healthy versus elderly individuals?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
Does isometric handgrip echocardiography differentiate normal from abnormal diastolic function in young healthy versus elderly individuals?
Isometric handgrip echocardiography is a simple and effective noninvasive stress test to evaluate and unmask diastolic dysfunction without the respiratory and movement artifacts of cycle exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small E/e' change in tiny young cohort warrants no practice shift; leaves open age-related diastolic responses for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Cycle exercise echocardiography is a useful tool to "unmask" diastolic dysfunction; however, this approach can be limited by respiratory and movement artifacts. Isometric handgrip avoids these issues while reproducibly increasing afterload and myocardial oxygen demand. HYPOTHESIS: Isometric handgrip echocardiography (IHE) can differentiate normal from abnormal diastolic function. METHODS: First recruited 19 young healthy individuals (mean age, 24 ± 4 years) to establish the "normal" response. To extend these observations to a more at-risk population, we performed IHE on 17 elderly individuals (mean age, 72 ± 6 years) with age-related diastolic dysfunction. The change in the ratio of mitral valve inflow velocity to lateral wall tissue velocity (E/e'), a surrogate for left ventricular filling pressure, was used to assess the diastolic stress response in each group. RESULTS: In the young subjects, isometric handgrip increased heart rate and mean arterial pressure (25 ± 12 bpm and 26 ± 17 mmHg, respectively), whereas E/e' changed minimally (0.6 ± 0.9). In the elderly subjects, heart rate and mean arterial pressure were similarly increased with isometric handgrip (19 ± 16 bpm and 25 ± 11 mmHg, respectively), whereas E/e' increased more dramatically (2.3 ± 1.7). Remarkably, 11 of the 17 elderly subjects had an abnormal diastolic response (ΔE/e': 3.4 ± 1.1), whereas the remaining 6 elderly subjects showed very little change (ΔE/e': 0.3 ± 0.7), independent of age or the change in myocardial oxygen demand. CONCLUSIONS: IHE is a simple, effective tool for evaluating diastolic function during simulated activities of daily living.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Age-related diastolic dysfunction (n=36). Isometric handgrip echocardiography vs. Young healthy individuals was evaluated on Change in the ratio of mitral valve inflow velocity to lateral wall tissue velocity (E/e').
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: