Key result
Nondipper hypertensive patients had a significantly lower peak percent increase in acetylcholine-stimulated forearm blood flow compared to dippers (228% vs. 473%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Is endothelial function impaired by oxidative stress in nondipper hypertensive patients compared to dipper hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=190)
Is endothelial function impaired by oxidative stress in nondipper hypertensive patients compared to dipper hypertensive patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 228% vs 473%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Nondipper hypertensive patients have impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation compared to dippers, which appears to be mediated by oxidative stress as it is improved by vitamin C.
Oxidative stress may underlie endothelial dysfunction in nondippers; hypothesis-generating for antioxidant outcome trials.
AIMS: Essential hypertension, as well as other established cardiovascular risk factors, is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Hypertensive patients with a nondipper circadian pattern have a greater risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications in comparison with those with a dipper circadian pattern. In this study, we evaluated the association between nondipper pattern and endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: We evaluated the forearm blood flow (FBF) response to intraarterial acetylcholine (ACh), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), an endothelium-independent vasodilator, infusions in 190 hypertensive patients stratified according to dipper and nondipper status. The FBF was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography. Effects of oxidative stress on FBF were evaluated by intraarterial infusion of vitamin C. Ambulatory BP monitorings were obtained by a validated oscillometric device (SpaceLabs 90207 Monitor Inc., Issaquah, WA, USA). RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were higher during daytime and lower during night-time in dipper subjects than in nondippers. The peak percent increase in ACh-stimulated FBF was higher in dippers than in nondippers (473% vs. 228%, P < 0.001). The FBF responses to SNP were similar in dipper and nondipper patients. The FBF response to ACh during coinfusion of vitamin C was higher in nondippers rather than in dipper hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS: Present data demonstrate that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in patients who have nondipper hypertension. The effects of vitamin C on impaired ACh-stimulated vasodilation support the hypothesis that oxidative stress contributes to endothelial dysfunction of nondipper hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maio et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension (n=190). Nondipper circadian blood pressure pattern vs. Dipper circadian blood pressure pattern was evaluated on Peak percent increase in acetylcholine-stimulated forearm blood flow (p=< 0.001). Nondipper hypertensive patients had a significantly lower peak percent increase in acetylcholine-stimulated forearm blood flow compared to dippers (228% vs. 473%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: