Key result
Documented OSAS is not associated with repeat ablation or cardioversion after PVI.
Why the study?
OSAS is common in AF and may influence AF phenotype and post-ablation recurrence, but its association with clinical phenotype and post-ablation rhythm-related outcomes remained unclear.
Does documented obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) predict post-ablation rhythm interventions or atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=2,559)
No
Does documented obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) predict post-ablation rhythm interventions or atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation?
In routine clinical care, documented obstructive sleep apnea identifies a worse cardiometabolic phenotype among patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation, but is not independently associated with post-ablation rhythm interventions or arrhythmia recurrence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Documented OSAS does not support altering post-ablation follow-up; leaves open whether OSAS treatment modifies rhythm outcomes.
Background Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is common in atrial fibrillation (AF) and may influence AF phenotype and post‐ablation recurrence. We aimed to determine whether documented OSAS identifies a distinct clinical phenotype and whether it is associated with post‐ablation rhythm‐related outcomes. Methods We performed a single‐center observational study with two overlapping cohorts. The principal registry cohort comprised 2559 patients with first AF ablation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) treated between November/2021 and July/2025. Its primary endpoint was the same‐center rhythm‐intervention endpoint, defined as the first post‐index repeat PVI or electrical cardioversion at the study center. A 7‐day Holter was scheduled 90 days after ablation. The nested active 2022 cohort comprised 666 AF/PVI patients. Results Documented OSAS was present in 268 of 2559 registry patients, 10.5%, and in 66 of 652 patients with known OSAS status in the active subset, 10.1%. Documented OSAS was associated with higher BMI, more obesity, hypertension, diabetes, persistent AF, higher triglycerides and liver enzymes, and lower HDL cholesterol. In the registry cohort, the same‐center rhythm‐intervention endpoint occurred in 59/268 patients with documented OSAS (22.0%) and 521/2291 without documented OSAS (22.7%; p = 0.788). Documented OSAS was not associated with the registry endpoint after adjustment (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.63–1.21; p = 0.411). In the active 2022 cohort, recurrence occurred in 16/32 patients with documented OSAS (50.0%) and 167/302 without documented OSAS (55.3%; p = 0.581). Adjusted Cox analysis also showed no independent documented OSAS (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.61–1.94; p = 0.786). Conclusion Documented OSAS identified an adverse cardiometabolic AF ablation phenotype but was not independently associated with same‐center rhythm interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohsen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (n=2,559). Documented obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) vs. No documented OSAS was evaluated on Same-center rhythm-intervention endpoint (first post-index repeat PVI or electrical cardioversion at the study center) (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.21, p=0.411). Documented OSAS was not independently associated with post-ablation repeat PVI or electrical cardioversion compared to no documented OSAS.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: