Key result
The Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G devices passed all ESH-IP 2010 revision requirements, with mean SBP differences of -1.5±5.1 and -0.6±4.7 mmHg respectively compared to mercury sphygmomanometer.
Why the study?
Do the Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G automatic devices accurately measure upper arm blood pressure compared to a standard mercury sphygmomanometer?
Population
33 participants per experiment
Comparison
Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G automatic… vs Standard mercury sphygmomanometer
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Supports routine clinical use of both Omron devices; leaves open need for outcome data in diverse populations.
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Do the Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G automatic devices accurately measure upper arm blood pressure compared to a standard mercury sphygmomanometer?
The Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G automatic blood pressure devices are valid and accurate for upper arm BP monitoring according to ESH-IP 2010 criteria.
Takahashi et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure monitoring (n=33). Omron HEM-7252G-HP and Omron HEM-7251G vs. Standard mercury sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Device-observer mercury sphygmomanometer BP differences within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg (ESH-IP revision 2010 criteria). The Omron HEM-7252G-HP and HEM-7251G devices passed all ESH-IP 2010 revision requirements, with mean SBP differences of -1.5±5.1 and -0.6±4.7 mmHg respectively compared to mercury sphygmomanometer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: