Proposes a framework addressing coordination failures in socio-technical systems through co-evolutionary design.
Traditional design methods fall short for complex socio-technical systems where social and technical elements co-evolve and emergent behaviors resist decomposition. This paper proposes a seven-stage Design for Complexity Framework integrating systems science and design theory. Stages 3–6 form an iterative co-evolution space where modeling, architecture, and stakeholder co-design mutually shape problem and solution development. A healthcare example illustrates how the framework’s co-evolutionary approach addresses coordination failures that purely technical or purely participatory methods miss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alrizqi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: