Key result
High on-treatment platelet reactivity was more frequent in patients exposed to clopidogrel compared to aspirin.
Why the study?
Optimal antithrombotic regimens for patients on OAC post-PCI are challenging, and data directly comparing the antiplatelet effects and high on-treatment platelet reactivity of clopidogrel versus ASA are lacking.
Does clopidogrel compared to aspirin result in higher rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients under antiplatelet therapy?
Observational (n=755)
No
Does clopidogrel compared to aspirin result in higher rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients under antiplatelet therapy?
Impaired pharmacodynamic response (high on-treatment platelet reactivity) is significantly more frequent with clopidogrel than with aspirin, suggesting aspirin may be a more reliable choice in combination with OAC post-PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher HTPR frequency with clopidogrel than aspirin post-PCI; hypothesis-generating for reactivity testing, should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed. RESULTS: 755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy. CONCLUSION: Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M’Pembele et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Patients on antiplatelet therapy (n=755). Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin (ASA) was evaluated on High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). High on-treatment platelet reactivity was more frequent in patients exposed to clopidogrel compared to aspirin.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: