Key result
Successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with HFrEF and myocardial viability significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction by 6.4 points (p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) improve left ventricular function and clinical parameters in patients with HFrEF and evidence of viability/ischemia?
Observational (n=32)
No
Does successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) improve left ventricular function and clinical parameters in patients with HFrEF and evidence of viability/ischemia?
Mean Difference: 6.4
Absolute Event Rate: 37.7% vs 31.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
Successful CTO-PCI in patients with HFrEF and myocardial viability or ischemia is associated with significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction, reverse remodeling, and clinical symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) can improve angina and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). These benefits were not assessed in populations with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We studied the effect of CTO-PCI on left ventricular function and clinical parameters in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), we studied 29 patients with HFrEF and evidence of viability and/or ischemia in the territory supplied by a CTO who were successfully treated with CTO-PCI. In patients with multi-vessel disease, non-CTO PCI was also performed. Imaging parameters, clinical status, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were evaluated before and 6 months after CTO-PCI. RESULTS: A decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (160 ± 54 ml vs. 143 ± 58 ml; p = 0.029) and an increase in LVEF (31.3 ± 7.4 % vs. 37.7 ± 8 %; p < 0.001) were observed. There were no differences in LVEF improvement between patients who underwent non-CTO PCI (n = 11) and those without this intervention (n = 18); (p = 0.73). The number of segments showing perfusion defects was significantly reduced (0.5 ± 1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.5; p = 0.043). Angina (p = 0.002) and NYHA functional class (p = 0.004) improved, and BNP levels decreased (p = 0.004) after CTO-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with HFrEF showing CMR evidence of viability and/or ischemia within the territory supplied by the CTO, an improvement in ejection fraction, left ventricular end-systolic volume and ischemia burden was observed after CTO-PCI. Clinical and laboratory parameters also improved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02570087 . Registered 6 October 2015.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardona et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and chronic total coronary occlusion (n=32). Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) vs. Baseline (pre-PCI) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months (MD 6.4, p=<0.001). Successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with HFrEF and myocardial viability significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction by 6.4 points (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: