This article examines generative AI’s affordances and limitations in technical editing through a care ethics framework. Using collaborative autoethnography, one instructor and four undergraduate students reflect on navigating care, GenAI, and author–editor relationships in a technical editing course. Findings suggest that GenAI can support novice editors as a communication tool but falls short of enacting the relational, context-sensitive care ethical editing demands. We call for editing pedagogy that foregrounds care alongside critical engagement with technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bryson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: