Key result
Patients with abnormal ejection fraction exhibited a lower percentage increase in stroke volume during postural stress compared to those with normal ejection fraction.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic response to postural stress using non-invasive inert gas rebreathing in patients with normal as well as impaired left ventricular function.
Can non-invasive inert gas rebreathing detect differences in hemodynamic response to postural stress between patients with normal and impaired left ventricular function?
Cross-Sectional (n=91)
No
Can non-invasive inert gas rebreathing detect differences in hemodynamic response to postural stress between patients with normal and impaired left ventricular function?
Non-invasive inert gas rebreathing is a feasible method to detect significant differences in stroke volume changes during postural stress between patients with normal and impaired ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Noninvasive IGR enables postural hemodynamic assessment across LV function; leaves open validation and clinical adoption.
In postural stress, an increased preload volume leads to higher stroke volume (SV) according to the Frank-Starling law of the heart. The present study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic response to postural stress using non-invasive inert gas rebreathing (IGR) in patients with normal as well as impaired left ventricular function. Hemodynamic measurements were performed in 91 patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Mean cardiac output and SV determined by IGR were 4.4±1.3 l/min and 60±19 ml in the upright position, which increased significantly to 5.0±1.2 l/min and 75±23 ml in the supine position (P<0.01). Left ventricular systolic function was normal [ejection fraction (EF) ≥55%] in 42 patients as determined by CMR. In 21 patients, EF was mildly abnormal (45-54%), in 16 patients moderately abnormal (30-44%) and in 12 patients severely abnormal (<30%). An overall trend for a lower percentage change in SV (%ΔSV) was indicated with increasing impairment of ejection fraction. In patients with abnormal EF in comparison to those with normal EF, the %ΔSV was significantly lower (13% vs. 22%; P=0.03). Non-invasive measurement of cardiac function using IGR during postural changes may be feasible and detected significant difference in %ΔSV in patients with normal and impaired EF according to the Frank-Starling law of the heart. Several clinical scenarios including cases of heart rhythm disturbances or pulmonary or congenital heart disease are worthy of further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stach et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Impaired left ventricular function (n=91). Abnormal ejection fraction (<55%) vs. Normal ejection fraction (≥55%) was evaluated on Percentage change in stroke volume (%\u0394SV) during postural stress (p=0.03). Patients with abnormal ejection fraction exhibited a lower percentage increase in stroke volume during postural stress compared to those with normal ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: