Key result
Coronary sinus eccentricity index <0.8 is 100% accurate for distinguishing persistent LSVC from right atrial overload.
Why the study?
Can coronary sinus cross-sectional area and eccentricity index differentiate persistent left superior vena cava from right atrial pressure overload in patients with a dilated coronary sinus?
Observational (n=15)
Can coronary sinus cross-sectional area and eccentricity index differentiate persistent left superior vena cava from right atrial pressure overload in patients with a dilated coronary sinus?
Effect estimate: 100% sensitivity and specificity
p-value: p=0.0003
A coronary sinus eccentricity index <0.8 on echocardiography is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing persistent left superior vena cava in patients with a dilated coronary sinus.
May aid echo differentiation of dilated coronary sinus causes; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension and right atrial pressure overload (RAPO) cause dilation of the coronary sinus (CS). Persistent connection of the left superior vena cava (LSVC) to the CS is another cause of CS dilation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of coronary sinus cross-sectional area (CSA) and eccentricity index (EI) in differentiating persistent LSVC from right heart overload and RAPO in patients with dilated CS. METHODS: We identified 15 patients with a dilated CS by echocardiography. Offline analysis was used to measure CS-CSA and CS-EI at end-diastole in the parasternal long axis plane. EI was defined as B/A, where A is the widest diameter and major axis of the CS, and B is the diameter of the minor axis (perpendicular to and bisecting A at its midpoint). Persistent LSVC was confirmed by either computed tomography or injection of agitated saline in the left antecubital vein. RESULTS: CS-CSA was significantly larger in PLSVC group than in group with RAPO. Also, CS-EI was lower in PLSVC than in RAPO group (P = 0.0003). EI was the most sensitive and specific discriminator between patients with persistent LSVC vs. RAPO. CS-EI was <0.8 in all PLSVC patients and >0.8 in all RAPO patients (sensitivity and specificity = 100%). CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent LSVC have a significantly higher CS-CSA than those with elevated RA pressure. When dilated CS is present, a CS-EI <0.8 is 100% sensitive and specific for persistent LSVC. Thus, the CS-EI can be used in cases of dilated CS to diagnose the presence of persistent LSVC with a very high degree of certainty, and can help differentiate this congenital anomaly from RAPO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolski et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Dilated coronary sinus (n=15). Coronary sinus eccentricity index (CS-EI) was evaluated on Differentiation of persistent left superior vena cava from right atrial pressure overload (100% sensitivity and specificity, p=0.0003). A coronary sinus eccentricity index <0.8 was 100% sensitive and specific for diagnosing persistent left superior vena cava over right atrial pressure overload in patients with a dilated coronary sinus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: