Key result
Longer-term ambulatory ECG monitoring devices, such as external loop recorders and insertable cardiac monitors, are more effective than 24-hour Holter ECG for assessing less frequent symptoms.
Why the study?
How should ambulatory ECG monitoring devices be selected for evaluating transient loss of consciousness or related symptoms?
How should ambulatory ECG monitoring devices be selected for evaluating transient loss of consciousness or related symptoms?
Selection of ambulatory ECG monitoring devices should be tailored to symptom frequency, with longer-term monitoring preferred for infrequent events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Event-captured ECGs aid symptom-arrhythmia correlation in T-LOC and palpitations; leaves open optimal device selection.
Capturing electrocardiograms (ECGs) during spontaneous events is the most powerful available tool to identify or exclude an arrhythmic cause of symptoms, and often can elucidate the definite diagnosis for different conditions, such as transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC), lightheadedness, or palpitations. Current ambulatory ECG monitoring technologies include 24-hour Holter, wearable event recorder, external loop recorder (ELR), and insertable cardiac monitoring (ICM). Of them, Holter ECG is most frequently used in daily practice in Japan, while ELR and ICM are less frequently used. However, the appropriate monitor choice should be based on the expected frequency of symptoms. Frequent events may be adequately detected by Holter ECG, but less frequent symptoms are more effectively assessed by longer-term monitoring (i.e., ELR or ICM). In this report, based on our clinical experience, we review the usefulness of ambulatory ECG monitoring devices, especially of ELR, for evaluating T-LOC and other potentially arrhythmia-related symptoms. Specifically, we focus on the use of ELR and ICM for evaluating Japanese patients with T-LOC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohno et al. (2017) conducted a review in Transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) and other potentially arrhythmia-related symptoms. Ambulatory ECG monitoring devices (external loop recorder and insertable cardiac monitoring) vs. 24-hour Holter ECG was evaluated. Longer-term ambulatory ECG monitoring devices, such as external loop recorders and insertable cardiac monitors, are more effective than 24-hour Holter ECG for assessing less frequent symptoms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: