Key result
Hybrid convergent procedure achieves ~79% arrhythmia freedom at 12 months in HFrEF with persistent AF.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation for AF in patients with HFrEF reduces morbidity and mortality, but outcomes of the convergent procedure specifically in patients with coexisting HFrEF and long-standing persistent AF needed description.
Does the hybrid convergent procedure improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=43)
Yes
Does the hybrid convergent procedure improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The hybrid convergent procedure is an effective and safe ablation option that maintains sinus rhythm and significantly improves left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with HFrEF and long-standing persistent AF.
• We aimed to describe the effect of hybrid convergent ablation. • The study population comprised 43 patients with LSPsAF and HFrEF. • The hybrid convergent procedure was associated with a low rate of complications. • The hybrid convergent procedure was also associated with a high success rate. • At 12-month follow-up, 79% of patients were without any atrial arrhythmia. • At 12-month follow-up, 49% of patients remained under antiarrhythmic drugs. • At 12-month follow-up, the median LVEF improvement was 8%. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is associated with a significant reduction in morbimortality. The convergent procedure is a valid ablation option for the treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. To describe the outcomes of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent the convergent procedure. We studied consecutive patients included in two French centres between 2009 and 2020. Primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia assessed on 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed on transthoracic echocardiography before and 1 year after the procedure. All patients had at least 12 months of follow-up. Forty-three patients were included (86% were men). Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 38 ± 10.5% and indexed left atrial volume was 50 ± 27 mL/m 2 . Among the study population, 34 patients (79%) were free from atrial fibrillation/tachycardia at the end of follow-up. No periprocedural death occurred. We observed two groin haematomas and four mild pericardial effusions. At 12-month follow-up, 21 patients (49%) were still on antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and a reduction in antiarrhythmic drug dosage was achieved in 10 patients (23%). The absolute median improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was 8% at 12 months ( P = 0.003). The convergent procedure has been shown to be effective and safe for patients with patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, with significant left ventricular function improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sébag et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=43). Hybrid convergent procedure was evaluated on Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia assessed on 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The hybrid convergent procedure in patients with HFrEF and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation resulted in 79% freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: