Key result
The Dinamap XL oscillometric device was inaccurate compared to mercury auscultation, with mean diastolic differences of 21.3 mmHg in children and -5.2 mmHg in adults (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does an oscillometric automated device accurately measure blood pressure compared to the mercury auscultatory method in children and adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=70)
Does an oscillometric automated device accurately measure blood pressure compared to the mercury auscultatory method in children and adults?
Effect estimate: Systolic MD +0.6 mmHg and diastolic MD 21.3 mmHg in children; systolic MD +0.4 mmHg and diastolic MD -5.2 mmHg in adults
p-value: p=<0.001
The accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure devices differs significantly between children and adults, highlighting the need for population-specific clinical validation.
BP device accuracy in children needs confirmation; this cohort study leaves open generalizability to broader pediatric populations.
Clinical validation of blood pressure oscillometric devices are almost exclusively conducted in adults. Because oscillometric devices are used in children, it is critical to assess their accuracy also in this population. We compared blood pressure readings using an oscillometric automated device (Dinamap XL, model CR9340) with readings obtained with the mercury auscultatory method in children and adults. Blood pressure was measured in 30 children (15 boys and 15 girls; 9.5+/-1.0 years old) and their parents (25 mothers and 15 fathers; 41.0+/-5.0 years old). In children, mean difference (+/-SD) in systolic blood pressure (DeltaBP) readings (oscillometric-auscultatory) was +0.6+/-4.7 mmHg (range: -10 to +11); mean diastolic DeltaBP was 21.3+/-7.5 mmHg (range: -18 to +19) and decreased with increasing diastolic BP. In adults, mean systolic DeltaBP was +0.4+/-5.2 mmHg (range: -12 to +15) and mean diastolic DeltaBP was -5.2+/-6.0 mmHg (range: -25 to +8) (p<0.001). While the device was not accurate enough to be recommended, our study also shows that the accuracy of blood pressure oscillometric devices can differ between children and adults. Clinical accuracy of oscillometric devices should be tested in the specific populations in whom blood pressure is measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chioléro et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure measurement (n=70). Oscillometric automated device (Dinamap XL, model CR9340) vs. Mercury auscultatory method was evaluated on Mean difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (oscillometric minus auscultatory) (Systolic MD +0.6 mmHg and diastolic MD 21.3 mmHg in children; systolic MD +0.4 mmHg and diastolic MD -5.2 mmHg in adults, p=<0.001). The Dinamap XL oscillometric device was inaccurate compared to mercury auscultation, with mean diastolic differences of 21.3 mmHg in children and -5.2 mmHg in adults (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: