Key result
Remimazolam reduces post-induction hypotension ~68% vs propofol in elderly hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Post-induction hypotension is common in elderly hypertensive patients and risks inadequate organ perfusion and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, prompting evaluation of remimazolam for prevention.
Does remimazolam reduce the incidence of post-induction hypotension compared to propofol in elderly hypertensive patients undergoing elective general anesthesia?
RCT (n=196)
Double-blind (patients, surgeons, data collectors, and analysts blinded; anesthesiologist unblinded)
Computer-generated random sequence (1:1 ratio)
No
Does remimazolam reduce the incidence of post-induction hypotension compared to propofol in elderly hypertensive patients undergoing elective general anesthesia?
Relative Risk: 0.318 (95% CI 0.175–0.578)
Absolute Event Rate: 46.5% vs 73.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Remimazolam provides better hemodynamic stability and significantly reduces the incidence of post-induction hypotension compared to propofol in elderly hypertensive patients.
Remimazolam may reduce PIH risk versus propofol during induction in elderly hypertensives; extends RCT evidence for its hemodynamic advantage in this population.
Purpose: Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is a common complication in elderly hypertensive patients, posing significant risks of inadequate organ perfusion and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the effectiveness of remimazolam in preventing PIH. Patients and methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 196 elderly hypertensive patients undergoing elective general anesthesia surgery were randomly allocated to either the remimazolam group (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P). Group R received remimazolam at a dose of 0.15-0.2 mg/kg via intravenous infusion at a rate of 6.0 mg/kg/h, while Group P received propofol at a dose of 1.0-1.5 mg/kg via intravenous infusion at a rate of 60 mg/kg/h during induction. Primary outcome was the incidence of PIH. Secondary outcomes included the time-weighted average (TWA) of hypotension, norepinephrine usage, key time-point blood pressures from induction to skin incision, and postoperative quality of recovery-15(QoR-15) scale on postoperative day 1 and day 3 (POD1 and POD3). Results: Among the 196 patients analyzed, Group R showed a significantly lower incidence of PIH compared to the Group P (46.5% vs 73.2%; P < 0.001). Additionally, Group R exhibited reduced frequency of hypotension (0 [0, 2] vs 2 [0, 3], P < 0.001), lower total time in hypotension (0 [0, 4] min vs 4 [0, 7] min, P < 0.001), lower TWA (0 [0, 0.67] mmHg vs 0.56 [0, 4.72] mmHg, P < 0.001), and decreased norepinephrine usage (0 [0, 16] μg vs 16 [0, 28] μg, P < 0.001). Hemodynamic stability was better maintained in Group R during anesthesia induction. No significant differences were observed in QoR-15 scores between the two groups on POD1 and POD3. Conclusion: Compared with propofol, remimazolam significantly reduces the incidence of PIH in elderly hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Elderly hypertensive patients undergoing elective general anesthesia surgery (n=196). Remimazolam vs. Propofol was evaluated on Incidence of post-induction hypotension (PIH) (RR 0.318, 95% CI 0.175, 0.578, p=<0.001). Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence of post-induction hypotension compared to propofol (46.5% vs 73.2%; RR 0.318) in elderly hypertensive patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: