Key result
Metabolically unhealthy phenotypes are linked to significantly higher carotid intima-media thickness and inflammatory markers.
Cohort (n=1,019)
p-value: p=<0.001
There is actually no consensus about the possibility that in some instances, obesity may be a benign metabolically healthy (MH) condition as opposed to a normal-weight but metabolically unhealthy (MUH) state. The aim of this study was to characterize MH condition and to investigate possible associations with metabolic and cardiovascular complications. One thousand nineteen people (range of age 18–90 years) of the cohort of the ABCD_2 study were investigated. Participants were classified as normal weight (BMI < 24.9 kg/m 2 ) or overweight-obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 ); they were also classified as MH in the presence of 0-1 among the following conditions: (a) prediabetes/type 2 diabetes, (b) hypertension, (c) hypertriglyceridemia or low HDL cholesterolemia, and (d) hypercholesterolemia. MUH condition was diagnosed if ≥2 of the conditions listed were found. The prevalence of overweight/obese people was 71.1%, of whom 27.4% were found to be MH. In addition, 36.7% of the normal-weight participants were MUH. HOMA-IR, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and the carotid intima-media thickness were significantly different in the 4 subgroups (P<0.001), with higher values observed in the MUH normal-weight and obese groups. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of identifying a MH condition in normal-weight and in obese people in order to offer better treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buscemi et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Metabolic health and obesity (n=1,019). Metabolically unhealthy phenotype (normal-weight or obese) vs. Metabolically healthy phenotype was evaluated on Differences in HOMA-IR, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and carotid intima-media thickness (p=<0.001). Metabolically unhealthy normal-weight and obese groups had significantly higher HOMA-IR, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and carotid intima-media thickness than healthy groups (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: