Why the study?
Data showing acute arterial stiffness changes after resistance versus endurance training derive from healthy subjects and have limited applicability to CAD and HF patients, for whom combined exercise is recommended.
Does high-volume combined endurance training compared to high-volume combined resistance training improve arterial stiffness in men with coronary artery disease and heart failure?
Does high-volume combined endurance training compared to high-volume combined resistance training improve arterial stiffness in men with coronary artery disease and heart failure?
In men with coronary artery disease and heart failure, acute combined endurance training decreases arterial stiffness, whereas combined resistance training increases it at 15 minutes post-exercise.
May not apply to low/high CV-risk patients; leaves open differential effects of combined training on arterial stiffness.
Resistance training has been shown to acutely increase arterial stiffness (AS), while endurance training appears to decrease AS. However, the findings are from studies in apparently healthy subjects and have limited applicability to patients at low and high cardiovascular risk, for whom combined exercise is recommended. We compared the time course of changes in local and regional indices of AS in response to high-volume combined endurance training (CET) and high-volume combined resistance training (CRT) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF). We studied 20 men with CAD and HF (10 each) aged 68.3 ± 9.6 years. AS was measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV), and brachial and central blood pressure (BP) were determined after 15 min of rest and 5 and 15 min after the exercise session. All patients completed two sessions on nonconsecutive days. A protocol by time interaction effect was observed for carotid (η2 = 0.21, p = 0.02), aortic (η2 = 0.60, p < 0.001), and femoral (η2 = 0.46, p = 0.01) PWV after CET and CRT, suggesting that PWV decreased after CET and increased after CRT. Decreases in the brachial and central variables of BP across time points were observed in both protocols. CET decreased whereas CRT increased carotid, aortic, and femoral PWV at 15 min after exercise in patients with CAD and HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2022) studied Coronary artery disease and heart failure (n=20). High-volume combined endurance training (CET) vs. High-volume combined resistance training (CRT) was evaluated on Carotid, aortic, and femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: