Key result
Melody valved stents and Contegra grafts had significantly lower 5-year survival free of infective endocarditis (84.9% and 87.8%, respectively) compared to homografts (98.7%; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the type of RVOT conduit (Melody, Contegra, or homograft) affect the incidence of infective endocarditis in patients with congenital heart disease?
Population
677 patients with congenital heart disease who received 738 valved conduits in the right ventricular outflow…
Comparison
Melody valved stent or Contegra graft vs Cryopreserved homograft (n=517 patients)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Melody: 2.0 years; Homograft: 6.5 years; Contegra: 8.8 years
Authors
Loading...
Melody implantation may heighten IE risk in congenital patients; leaves open optimal prestenting and prevention strategies for prospective validation.
Cohort (n=677)
No
Does the type of RVOT conduit (Melody, Contegra, or homograft) affect the incidence of infective endocarditis in patients with congenital heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 84.9% vs 98.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Contegra and Melody valved stents are associated with a significantly higher incidence of infective endocarditis compared to cryopreserved homografts in patients with congenital heart disease.
Dijck et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease requiring pulmonary valve replacement (n=677). Melody valved stent and Contegra graft vs. Cryopreserved homograft was evaluated on Survival free of infective endocarditis at 5 years (p=<0.001). Melody valved stents and Contegra grafts had significantly lower 5-year survival free of infective endocarditis (84.9% and 87.8%, respectively) compared to homografts (98.7%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: