Key result
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome following transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of long-term all-cause mortality (HR 10.5) compared to patients without SIRS.
Why the study?
Outcomes after TAVI are thought to be influenced by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) on both a short-term and long-term basis.
Does the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) worsen clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomographic outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Cohort (n=224)
No
Does the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) worsen clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomographic outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?
Hazard Ratio: 10.5 (95% CI 2.32–47.33)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.8% vs 1.4%
p-value: p=0.002
The development of SIRS early after TAVI is associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes, including increased mortality and readmissions.
SIRS after TAVI was associated with higher mortality and readmissions; leaves open whether inflammation is causal or a modifiable target.
Background Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a systemic insult that has been described with many interventional cardiac procedures. The outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are thought to be influenced by this syndrome not only on short-term, but also on long-term. Objective We assessed the association of SIRS to different clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomographic (CT) outcomes after TAVI. Methods Two hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled in this study. They were assessed for the occurrence of SIRS within the first 48 h after TAVI. Patients were followed-up for short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Serial echocardiographic follow-ups were conducted at 1-week, 6-months, and 1-year. CT follow-up at 1 year was recorded. Results Eighty patients (36%) developed SIRS. Among different parameters, only pre-TAVI total leucocytic count (TLC), pre-TAVI heart rate, and post-TAVI systolic blood pressure independently predicted the occurrence of SIRS. The incidence of HALT was not significantly different between both groups, albeit higher among SIRS patients ( p = 0.1) at 1-year CT follow-up. Both groups had similar patterns of LV recovery on serial echocardiography. Long-term follow-up showed that all-cause death, cardiac death, and re-admission for heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were significantly more frequent among SIRS patients. Early safety and clinical efficacy outcomes were more frequently encountered in the SIRS group, while device-related events and time-related valve safety were comparable. Conclusion Although SIRS implies an early acute inflammatory status post-TAVI, yet its clinical sequelae seem to extend to long-term clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=224). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) vs. No SIRS was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 10.5, 95% CI 2.32-47.33, p=0.002). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome following transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of long-term all-cause mortality (HR 10.5) compared to patients without SIRS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: