Key result
Age-standardised incidence of heart failure has decreased since 2000, but incidence in patients <55 years is increasing, and up to one-third of patients do not survive beyond 1 year.
Why the study?
The burden of heart failure is changing as population ageing is potentially offset by improved primary cardiovascular prevention and therapeutic advances, motivating an evaluation of recent international trends.
This review highlights that while overall age-standardized heart failure incidence is decreasing, it is rising in younger patients, and 1-year mortality remains unacceptably high.
Declining age-standardised HF incidence supports prevention gains; leaves open net burden effects in aging populations.
Heart failure is a common healthcare problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. The burden of heart failure is changing; increases secondary to an ageing population may be offset by improved primary cardiovascular prevention and advances in heart failure therapies. In this review, we evaluate recent international trends in heart failure incidence, morbidity and mortality. Although the age-standardised incidence of heart failure has been decreasing since 2000, the incidence in those age groups <55 years is increasing with patients being diagnosed at younger ages. Despite improvements in therapies for heart failure, prognosis still remains poor with up to one-third of patients not surviving beyond 1 year following diagnosis and no improvements in mortality over the past 10 years. The case-mix of heart failure patients is changing with a greater proportion having non-ischaemic aetiology and preserved ejection fraction, and a higher prevalence of non-cardiovascular comorbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure. Age-standardised incidence of heart failure has decreased since 2000, but incidence in patients <55 years is increasing, and up to one-third of patients do not survive beyond 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: