Key result
Home-measured isolated systolic hypertension and isolated diastolic hypertension increased the risk of composite cardiovascular events compared to normotension.
Why the study?
Does isolated diastolic or systolic hypertension defined by home blood pressure measurements increase the risk of composite cardiovascular events compared to normotension in adults aged 44-74 years?
Cohort (n=1,924)
Yes
Does isolated diastolic or systolic hypertension defined by home blood pressure measurements increase the risk of composite cardiovascular events compared to normotension in adults aged 44-74 years?
Home-measured isolated diastolic and systolic hypertension, as well as home pulse pressure, are independent predictors of cardiovascular events, outperforming office-measured pulse pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Home BP-defined isolated systolic/diastolic hypertension signals elevated CV risk; leaves open whether it refines stratification beyond office BP.
OBJECTIVE: The overall cardiovascular prognosis of isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic hypertension and pulse pressure defined with home blood pressure (BP) measurements remains unclear. METHODS: A prospective nationwide study was initiated in 2000-2001 on 1924 randomly selected participants aged 44-74 years. We determined home and office BP at baseline and classified the individuals into four groups according to their home BP levels: normotension, isolated diastolic hypertension, isolated systolic hypertension and systolic-diastolic hypertension. The primary endpoint was incidence of a composite cardiovascular event. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.2 years, 236 individuals had suffered a cardiovascular event. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, the relative hazards and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiovascular events were significantly higher in participants with isolated diastolic hypertension (relative hazard 1.95; 95% CI, 1.06-3.57; P=0.03), isolated systolic hypertension (relative hazard 2.08; 95% CI, 1.42-3.05; P<0.001) and systolic-diastolic hypertension (relative hazard 2.79; 95% CI, 2.02-3.86; P<0.001) than in participants with normotension. Home (relative hazard 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.40; P=0.009 per 10 mmHg increase), but not office (relative hazard 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21, P=0.06) pulse pressure, adjusted for mean arterial pressure, was an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSION: Isolated diastolic and systolic hypertension defined with home measurements are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Close follow-up and possible treatment of these patients is therefore warranted. Home-measured pulse pressure is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events while office-measured pulse pressure is not, which fortifies the view that home BP provides more accurate risk prediction than office BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niiranen et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=1,924). Isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension (home measurements) vs. Normotension was evaluated on incidence of a composite cardiovascular event (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.42-3.05, p=<0.001). Home-measured isolated systolic hypertension and isolated diastolic hypertension increased the risk of composite cardiovascular events compared to normotension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: