Key result
Small balloon predilation linked to ~11-point lower incidence of no reflow in STEMI.
Why the study?
Data are lacking regarding optimal balloon size and its effect on procedural and clinical outcomes during predilation before stenting in pPCI.
Does small balloon predilation improve coronary flow and reduce procedural complications compared to large balloon predilation in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Observational (n=384)
Yes
Does small balloon predilation improve coronary flow and reduce procedural complications compared to large balloon predilation in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, using a smaller predilation balloon (≤50% of the proximal vessel diameter) is associated with reduced incidence of no-reflow, fewer procedural complications, and better ST-segment resolution compared to larger balloons.
Does not support practice change in STEMI pPCI; hypothesis-generating and leaves open randomized confirmation of balloon sizing.
Background: In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), balloon predilation is frequently carried out before stenting but there is a lack of data regarding optimal balloon size and the effect of balloon size on procedural and clinical outcomes. Aims: This study compares small balloon predilation (≤50% of proximal vessel diameter) with large balloon predilation (>50% of proximal vessel diameter) in pPCI. Methods: This multicentre prospective observational study included consecutive ST elevation MI (STEMI) patients undergoing pPCI at three tertiary centres in Egypt. Demographic, clinical and angiographic data were collected for all the patients. The primary outcome was the presence of no reflow at the conclusion of the procedure and secondary outcomes included procedural complications - no reflow, dissection, abrupt vessel closure, fluoroscopy time and procedural time - and clinical outcomes - in-hospital left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis, ventricular fibrillation, stroke, death, ST-segment resolution >50% 1 hour after PCI and LVEF at discharge. Results: A total of 384 pPCI procedures were included. The small balloon group (n=222) and the large balloon group (n=162) were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. The large balloon group had a significantly higher incidence of no reflow (n=23 [14.2%] versus n=6 [2.7%], p<0.001), procedural complications: n=31 [19.4%] versus n=10 [4.5%], p<0.001) and contrast volume (190.4 ± 40.2 ml versus 177.4 ± 29.4 ml, p=0.0003) compared to the small balloon group. ST-segment resolution >50% after PCI was more frequent in the small balloon group (n=182 [81.98%] versus n=109 [67.28%], p<0.001). Conclusion: This study suggests that using a smaller balloon size for predilation in pPCI is associated with improved coronary flow, reduced procedural complications and better ST-segment resolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tantawy et al. (2025) conducted an observational in ST elevation MI (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) (n=384). Small balloon predilation (≤50% of proximal vessel diameter) vs. Large balloon predilation (>50% of proximal vessel diameter) was evaluated on Incidence of no reflow (p=<0.001). Small balloon predilation (≤50% of proximal vessel diameter) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of no reflow compared to large balloon predilation (2.7% vs 14.2%, p<0.001) in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: