Key result
Predilation during primary PCI in high thrombus STEMI is linked to ~64% more slow flow/no-reflow.
Why the study?
Distal embolization from microthrombus fragments during predilation ballooning may cause slow flow/no-reflow in high thrombus burden STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Does predilation ballooning increase the incidence of intraprocedure slow flow/no-reflow in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI?
Cross-Sectional (n=765)
Does predilation ballooning increase the incidence of intraprocedure slow flow/no-reflow in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI?
Predilation ballooning prior to primary PCI in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden is associated with a significantly increased risk of intraprocedural slow flow/no-reflow.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urges caution with predilation in high-thrombus STEMI PCI; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background. Distal embolization due to microthrombus fragments formed during predilation ballooning is considered one of the possible mechanisms of slow flow/no-reflow (SF/NR). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with high thrombus burden (≥4 grade) with and without predilation ballooning for culprit lesion preparation. Methodology. This prospective descriptive cross-sectional study included patients with a high thrombus burden (≥4 grades) who underwent primary PCI. Propensity-matched cohorts of patients with and without predilation ballooning in a 1 : 1 ratio were compared for the incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR. Results. A total of 765 patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. The mean age was 55.75 ± 11.54 years, and 78.6% (601) were males. Predilation ballooning was conducted in 346 (45.2%) patients. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR was significantly higher (41.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.001 ) in patients with predilation ballooning than in those without preballooning, respectively. The incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR also remained significantly higher for the predilation ballooning cohort with an incidence rate of 41.3% as against 30.1% ( p = 0.002 ) for the propensity-matched cohort of patients without predilation ballooning with a relative risk of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.20 to 2.24). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rate remained higher but insignificant, among patients with and without predilation ballooning (8.1% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.090 ). Conclusion. In conclusion, predilation ballooning can be associated with an increased risk of incidence of intraprocedure SF/NR during primary PCI in patients with high thrombus burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in STEMI with high thrombus burden (n=765). Predilation ballooning vs. No predilation ballooning was evaluated on Incidence of intraprocedure slow flow/no-reflow (SF/NR) (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.24, p=0.002). Predilation ballooning during primary PCI in high thrombus burden STEMI was associated with increased intraprocedure slow flow/no-reflow.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: